Suppr超能文献

白人至上主义者如何利用遗传学:从遗传血统和人类生物多样性到反科学和元政治。

How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics.

机构信息

UCLA Institute for Society and Genetics, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jun;175(2):387-398. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24150. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our aim in this study was to understand how genetics ideas are appropriated and mobilized online toward the political projects of White nationalism and the alt right. Studying three different online venues, we investigated how genetics is used to support racial realism, hereditarianism, and racial hierarchy. We analyzed how these ideas are connected to political and metapolitical projects. In addition, we examined the strategies used to build authority for these interpretations.

METHODS

We analyze three online venues in which genetics has been mobilized to advance racial realism and hereditarian explanations of racial differences. These were (a) the use of genetic ancestry tests in online nationalist discussions, (b) blogs and other venues in which the human biodiversity ideas are articulated, (c) activities surrounding the OpenPsych collection of online journals. Ethnographic and interpretive methods were applied to investigate scientific and political meanings of efforts to mobilize genetic ideas.

RESULTS

We found that White nationalists use genetic ancestry tests to align White identity with ideas of racial purity and diversity, educating each other about genetics, and debating the boundaries of Whiteness. "Human biodiversity" has been mobilized as a movement to catalog and create hereditarian ideas about racial differences and to distribute them as "red pills" to transform online discourse. The OpenPsych journals have allowed amateur hereditarian psychologists to publish papers, coordinate activity, and legitimate their project at the academic margins.

CONCLUSIONS

These various appropriations of genetics aim to further racial realism and hereditarian explanations of racial social and behavioral differences. Beyond these substantive aims, on a "metapolitical" level, they serve to reframe concepts and standards for political and scientific discussion of race, challenge structures of academic legitimacy and expertise, and build a cadre of ideological foot soldiers armed with an argumentative toolkit. As professional anthropologists and geneticists aim to accurately communicate their science and its implications for understanding human differences to the public, they must contend with these substantive claims and metapolitical contexts.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在理解遗传学思想如何被挪用和动员,以支持白人至上主义和另类右翼的政治项目。通过研究三个不同的在线场所,我们调查了遗传学如何被用于支持种族现实主义、遗传决定论和种族等级制度。我们分析了这些思想如何与政治和元政治项目联系在一起。此外,我们还研究了用于为这些解释建立权威的策略。

方法

我们分析了三个在线场所,其中遗传学被动员来推进种族现实主义和遗传解释种族差异。这些场所包括:(a)在线民族主义讨论中使用基因祖先测试,(b)阐述人类生物多样性思想的博客和其他场所,(c)围绕在线期刊 OpenPsych 集合的活动。我们采用民族志和解释学方法来研究动员遗传思想的科学和政治意义。

结果

我们发现,白人至上主义者使用基因祖先测试将白人身份与种族纯洁和多样性的观念联系起来,相互教育遗传学知识,并就白人身份的边界展开辩论。“人类生物多样性”被动员为一个运动,旨在对种族差异进行分类和创造遗传决定论思想,并将其作为“红色药丸”分发,以改变在线话语。OpenPsych 期刊允许业余遗传决定论心理学家发表论文、协调活动,并在学术边缘为其项目提供合法性。

结论

这些对遗传学的各种挪用旨在进一步推进种族现实主义和遗传决定论对种族社会和行为差异的解释。除了这些实质性目标,在“元政治”层面上,它们旨在重新构建政治和科学讨论种族的概念和标准,挑战学术合法性和专业知识的结构,并培养一批武装有辩论工具包的意识形态战士。随着专业人类学家和遗传学家努力向公众准确传达他们的科学及其对理解人类差异的影响,他们必须应对这些实质性主张和元政治背景。

相似文献

1
How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jun;175(2):387-398. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24150. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science.
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):653-681. doi: 10.1177/0306312719861434. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
4
Scientific supremacy: How do genetic narratives relate to racism?
Politics Life Sci. 2024;43(1):99-131. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.15. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
5
"[This] system was not made for [you]:" A case for decolonial Scientia.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jun;175(2):350-362. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24199. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Science, Society, and Dismantling Racism.
Health Equity. 2023 Jan 20;7(1):38-44. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.29023.cro. eCollection 2023.
7
Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.
Am Psychol. 2024 May-Jun;79(4):497-508. doi: 10.1037/amp0001228.
9
The Maintenance of the U.S. Racial Hierarchy Through Judgments of Multiracial People Based on Proximity to Whiteness.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jun;49(6):969-984. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086175. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Power and Limitations of Inferring Genetic Ancestry.
Ann Hum Genet. 2025 Sep;89(5):264-273. doi: 10.1111/ahg.70007. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.
Harv J Law Technol. 2024;38(2 Symposium):553-576.
4
The multi-scale complexity of human genetic variation beyond continental groups.
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 16:2024.12.11.627824. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.11.627824.
5
How to Diagnose Abhorrent Science.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Nov;54(6):18-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.4946.
7
Confronting the "Weaponization" of Genetics by Racists Online and Elsewhere.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S14-S21. doi: 10.1002/hast.4925.
8
The Geneticization of Education and Its Bioethical Implications.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Nov 7:1-17. doi: 10.1017/S096318012400046X.
9
The clinical, mechanistic, and social impacts of air pollution on atopic dermatitis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct;154(4):861-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.027. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
Race science without racists: how bigoted paradigms persist in allergy research.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;12:1351732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351732. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations.
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 25;10(1):3328. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11112-0.
2
Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science.
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):653-681. doi: 10.1177/0306312719861434. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
Tread Lightly Interpreting Polygenic Tests of Selection.
Genetics. 2018 Apr;208(4):1351-1355. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.300786.
4
SCIENCE AND SOCIETY. Taking race out of human genetics.
Science. 2016 Feb 5;351(6273):564-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4951.
5
The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States.
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 8;96(1):37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
Genomic designation: how genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories.
Soc Stud Sci. 2011 Apr;41(2):203-26. doi: 10.1177/0306312710391923.
7
The rise of the genome bloggers.
Nature. 2010 Dec 16;468(7326):880-1. doi: 10.1038/468880a.
8
Genetics. The illusive gold standard in genetic ancestry testing.
Science. 2009 Jul 3;325(5936):38-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1173038.
9
Genetics. The science and business of genetic ancestry testing.
Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):399-400. doi: 10.1126/science.1150098.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验