• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非管型与传统微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肠埃希菌菌尿症患者的安全性和疗效比较。

Comparison of safety and efficacy of tubeless vs. conventional mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with Escherichia coli bacteriuria.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China.

Department of Urology, Changsha Economic Development Zone Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, 410100, China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 3;52(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01567-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01567-2
PMID:38568426
Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteriuria. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 patients with E. coli bacteriuria who underwent PCNL. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether a nephrostomy tube is placed at the end of the procedure. Preoperative clinical data, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting success rate of PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria was performed. After PCNL, residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were considered as success. At baseline, the two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, BMI, underlying disease, hydronephrosis, stone characteristics, and urinalysis. Postoperative fever occurred in 1 patient (3.8%) in the tubeless PCNL group, and in 5 patients (8.6%) in the conventional PCNL group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of successful rate, decrease in hemoglobin, pain scores, blood transfusion, and hospitalization expenses. However, the tubeless PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (60 vs. 70 min, p = 0.033), indwelling time of catheter (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and hospital stays (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001) than the conventional PCNL group. In the analysis of factors predicting success, the stone diameter, stone burden, and operative time were associated with success rate of PCNL. It is safe and effective to perform tubeless PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria. Compared to conventional PCNL, tubeless PCNL accelerates patient recovery and shortens hospital stays.

摘要

评估无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)在大肠埃希菌(E. coli)菌尿症患者中的安全性和疗效。我们对 84 例 E. coli 菌尿症患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者均接受了 PCNL。根据手术结束时是否放置肾造瘘管,将患者分为两组。比较了两组患者的术前临床资料、手术结果和术后并发症。然后,对预测 E. coli 菌尿症患者 PCNL 成功率的因素进行了回归分析。PCNL 后,残余碎片 ≤ 4 mm 被认为是成功的。在基线时,两组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、基础疾病、肾积水、结石特征和尿液分析方面相似。无管 PCNL 组术后发热 1 例(3.8%),常规 PCNL 组 5 例(8.6%)(p > 0.05)。两组患者的成功率、血红蛋白下降、疼痛评分、输血和住院费用无显著差异。然而,无管 PCNL 组的手术时间(60 分钟 vs. 70 分钟,p = 0.033)、导尿管留置时间(2 天 vs. 4 天,p < 0.001)和住院时间(3 天 vs. 5 天,p < 0.001)明显短于常规 PCNL 组。在预测成功率的因素分析中,结石直径、结石负荷和手术时间与 PCNL 的成功率相关。对于 E. coli 菌尿症患者,行无管 PCNL 是安全有效的。与常规 PCNL 相比,无管 PCNL 可加速患者康复,缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of safety and efficacy of tubeless vs. conventional mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with Escherichia coli bacteriuria.非管型与传统微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肠埃希菌菌尿症患者的安全性和疗效比较。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 3;52(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01567-2.
2
Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.外置输尿管导管在无管经皮肾镜取石术中的安全性和有效性
Urol J. 2019 Aug 17;17(5):456-461. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5280.
3
Safety and efficacy of standard vs. tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric populations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.标准经皮肾镜取石术与无管经皮肾镜取石术在儿科人群中的安全性和有效性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 2;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01798-4.
4
Complications of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术的并发症比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):63-67. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03772-1. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
[Comparison of tubeless-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of upper-ureteral calculi sized ≥ 1.5 cm].无管经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗直径≥1.5 cm上段输尿管结石的比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb 18;47(1):170-4.
6
Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.质疑无管经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的合理性:早期拔管与无管经皮肾镜碎石术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
7
Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机临床试验
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis.无管化操作可减少经皮肾镜取石术后住院时间和疼痛:多变量分析结果。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Aug;41(4):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0565-8. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准技术。
Mymensingh Med J. 2024 Oct;33(4):980-988.
10
Tubeless versus standard PCNL in geriatric population.老年人群中无管与标准经皮肾镜取石术的比较
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Oct;39(8):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of standard vs. tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric populations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.标准经皮肾镜取石术与无管经皮肾镜取石术在儿科人群中的安全性和有效性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 2;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01798-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of minimal invasive exit strategies after percutaneous stone treatment.无管经皮肾镜取石术:经皮结石治疗后微创出口策略的评估。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Sep;30(5):679-683. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000802.
2
The Effect of Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter on Intrapelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy.内镜鞘直径比对输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术时肾盂内压的影响。
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):132-139. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0774.
3
Current Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli.
大肠杆菌的抗菌药物耐药性的最新趋势。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2018;416:181-211. doi: 10.1007/82_2018_110.
4
Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome after retrograde intrarenal surgery: Risk factors and predictive model.逆行性肾内手术后发热和全身炎症反应综合征:危险因素和预测模型。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;34(7):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Evaluation of preoperative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor of stone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience.评价术前结石表面积测量对钬激光联合输尿管镜碎石取石术后无结石状态的预测价值:单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):715-21. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0548. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nephrostomy Placement Versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.肾造瘘术与无管经皮肾镜取石术的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2010 Oct 19. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0231.
7
Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-bore or pigtail catheter?经皮肾镜取石术后的肾造瘘管:大口径导管还是猪尾导管?
J Endourol. 2000 Nov;14(9):735-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2000.14.735.
8
Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery.无管经皮肾手术
J Urol. 1997 May;157(5):1578-82.