• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准技术。

Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.

机构信息

Dr Md Fazlul Haq Siddique, Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Mymensingh Medical College (MMC), Mymensingh, Bangladesh; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2024 Oct;33(4):980-988.

PMID:39351714
Abstract

Traditionally, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) includes placing a nephrostomy tube and a Double J (DJ) stent to drain the kidney and operative tract following the procedure. However, more recent techniques, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, eliminate these drainage methods. The objective was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of performing tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL in comparison to standard PCNL a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 patients who underwent PCNL treatment From September 2022 to September 2023. Of these, 78 patients received traditional nephrostomy PCNL, while 46 patients underwent the tubeless procedure and the remaining 32 received the totally tubeless procedure. The three groups showed no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics. The operation time, analgesic requirements and hospital stay were lower in the tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, stone-free status or the occurrence of major complications. The overall complications (Grade-1, 2 and 3) rate was 14.2% in the standard PCNL group, 8.7% in the tubeless PCNL and 9.4% in the totally tubeless PCNL group. The tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL techniques have proven to be safe and effective, even for patients with incomplete staghorn stones and a moderate pelvic stone burden. These approaches are associated with reduced pain, lower analgesic needs, shorter operative times, and decreased hospital stays, making them more cost- effective and less likely to result in complications, while also improving patient satisfaction. Further research is essential to validate the safety of these techniques, encouraging urologists to adopt them in clinical practice.

摘要

传统的经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)包括在手术后放置肾造瘘管和双 J(DJ)支架来引流肾脏和手术通道。然而,最近的技术,如无管或完全无管 PCNL,消除了这些引流方法。目的是评估与标准 PCNL 相比,无管或完全无管 PCNL 的可行性、安全性和有效性。回顾性分析了 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月期间接受 PCNL 治疗的 156 例患者。其中,78 例患者接受传统肾造瘘 PCNL,46 例患者接受无管手术,32 例患者接受完全无管手术。三组患者术前患者特征无显著差异。无管和完全无管 PCNL 组的手术时间、镇痛需求和住院时间均低于标准 PCNL 组(p<0.05)。无管和完全无管 PCNL 组的平均结石大小、结石清除率或主要并发症的发生无显著差异。标准 PCNL 组的总体并发症(1 级、2 级和 3 级)发生率为 14.2%,无管 PCNL 组为 8.7%,完全无管 PCNL 组为 9.4%。无管和完全无管 PCNL 技术已被证明是安全有效的,即使对于不完全鹿角结石和中度骨盆结石负担的患者也是如此。这些方法与减少疼痛、降低镇痛需求、缩短手术时间和减少住院时间有关,使其更具成本效益,并发症发生的可能性更低,同时提高患者满意度。进一步的研究对于验证这些技术的安全性至关重要,鼓励泌尿科医生在临床实践中采用这些技术。

相似文献

1
Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准技术。
Mymensingh Med J. 2024 Oct;33(4):980-988.
2
Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机临床试验
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.完全无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:临床结果与成本分析
J Endourol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1487-94. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0421.
4
Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.外置输尿管导管在无管经皮肾镜取石术中的安全性和有效性
Urol J. 2019 Aug 17;17(5):456-461. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5280.
5
Postoperative Outcomes after Tubeless, Totally Tubeless, Standard, and Standard with Ureteral Stent Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Nationwide Retrospective Study in Japan.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后无管化、完全无管化、标准和标准置管输尿管支架:日本全国回顾性研究。
Urol Int. 2020;104(5-6):445-451. doi: 10.1159/000505103. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
7
Supra-costal tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is not associated with increased complication rate: a prospective study of safety and efficacy of supra-costal versus sub-costal access.经肋上无管经皮肾镜取石术与增加并发症发生率无关:经肋上与肋下入路的安全性和有效性的前瞻性研究。
BMC Urol. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0429-1.
8
Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.我们是否惧怕无管经皮肾镜取石术?评估经皮肾镜取石术后置管引流的必要性。
Urol Ann. 2016 Jan-Mar;8(1):70-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.162214.
9
Safety of tubeless or totally tubeless drainage and nephrostomy tube as a drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comprehensive review.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后无管或完全无管引流及肾造瘘管作为引流的安全性:全面综述。
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
Complications of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术的并发症比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):63-67. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03772-1. Epub 2023 Sep 5.