Ozturk H
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sifa University, Izmir, Turquía.
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Oct;39(8):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a standard, safe, and efficient method for large-volume renal calculi for all age groups. Nephrostomy tube constitutes an invaluable part of the nephrolithotomy operation. However, the nephrostomy tube has been recently replaced with ureteral catheter or double J-stent thanks to advances in urotechnology and operation equipment. The aim of the current article was to evaluate the safety and reliability of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the geriatric population.
Between January 2009 and September 2013, a total of 52 patients aged 65 years or elder with renal calculi bigger than 2cm underwent PCNL operation. The first group of 25 patients (48%) with a mean age of 70.0 years (std:±3,8) underwent tubeless PCNL whereas the second group consisting of 27 (52%) patients with a mean age of 71.3 years (std: ±4,0) underwent standard PCNL. The patients were randomly compared retrospectively in terms of burden of calculus, analgesic requirement, creatinine value, renal parenchymal thickness, Body-mass index (BMI), clavien score, length of hospitalization, and being calculus-free.
The groups were found to be similar in age, BMI, and gender (P>.05). Burden of calculus, duration of operation, and rate of narcotic analgesic use were found to be statistically significantly higher in the group of Standard PCNL group than in the Tubeless PCNL group (P<.05). Length of hospital stay was 1.7 days in the group of tubeless PCNL and 2.6 days in the standard PCNL group (P<.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of fall in hemoglobin, creatinine, values of parenchymal thickness, and clavien score, preoperative blood transfusion, previous SWL, location of calculi, number of access, and rate of success (P>.05). Burden of calculus was 900 mm2 (304-4232) in the standard PCNL group and 600mm(2) (220-2660) in the tubeless PCNL group with the difference being statistically significant (P=.014). Overall success was achieved in 96.0 and 96.3% of tubeless PCNL and standard PCNL patients after one session of PCNL, respectively.
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy was found to be as safe and effective as standard PCNL in the geriatric population. It is recommended especially in this group of patients because of its advantages such as shorter length of hospitalization, less analgesic requirement, and earlier mobilization.
经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种针对所有年龄组的大容量肾结石的标准、安全且有效的方法。肾造瘘管是肾镜取石术操作中不可或缺的一部分。然而,由于泌尿外科技术和手术设备的进步,肾造瘘管最近已被输尿管导管或双J支架所取代。本文的目的是评估老年人群中无管经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和可靠性。
2009年1月至2013年9月期间,共有52例年龄在65岁及以上、肾结石大于2cm的患者接受了PCNL手术。第一组25例患者(48%),平均年龄70.0岁(标准差:±3.8),接受了无管PCNL,而第二组由27例(52%)患者组成,平均年龄71.3岁(标准差:±4.0),接受了标准PCNL。对患者在结石负荷、镇痛需求、肌酐值、肾实质厚度、体重指数(BMI)、Clavien评分、住院时间和结石清除情况等方面进行回顾性随机比较。
两组在年龄、BMI和性别方面相似(P>0.05)。发现标准PCNL组的结石负荷、手术时间和麻醉性镇痛药使用率在统计学上显著高于无管PCNL组(P<0.05)。无管PCNL组的住院时间为1.7天,标准PCNL组为2.6天(P<0.05)。两组在血红蛋白下降、肌酐、实质厚度值和Clavien评分、术前输血、既往体外冲击波碎石术、结石位置、穿刺通道数量和成功率方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。标准PCNL组的结石负荷为900mm²(304 - 4232),无管PCNL组为600mm²(220 - 2660),差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.014)。一次PCNL术后,无管PCNL组和标准PCNL组的总体成功率分别为96.0%和96.3%。
在老年人群中,无管经皮肾镜取石术被发现与标准PCNL一样安全有效。由于其住院时间短、镇痛需求少和早期活动等优点,尤其推荐在这类患者中使用。