• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估多组分干预措施对长期冲突地区缺乏功能性供水的初级卫生保健中心和学校手部卫生及健康状况的效果:一项整群随机对照试验方案

Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention on Hand Hygiene and Well-Being in Primary Health Care Centers and Schools Lacking Functional Water Supply in Protracted Conflict Settings: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Galli Anaïs, Ma'ani Abuzahra Yaman, Bänziger Carola, Ballo Aboubacar, Friedrich Max N D, Gross Karin, Harter Miriam, Hattendorf Jan, Peter Maryna, Tamas Andrea, Owen Branwen N, Winkler Mirko S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.

Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 3;13:e52959. doi: 10.2196/52959.

DOI:10.2196/52959
PMID:38569182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11024751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene is crucial in health care centers and schools to avoid disease transmission. Currently, little is known about hand hygiene in such facilities in protracted conflict settings.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol aims to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent hand hygiene intervention on handwashing behavior, underlying behavioral factors, and the well-being of health care workers and students. Moreover, we report our methodology and statistical analysis plan transparently.

METHODS

This is a cluster randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms taking place in 4 countries for 1 year. In Burkina Faso and Mali, we worked in 24 primary health care centers per country, whereas in Nigeria and Palestine, we focused on 26 primary schools per country. Facilities were eligible if they were not connected to a functioning water source but were deemed accessible to the implementation partners. Moreover, health care centers were eligible if they had a maternity ward and ≥5 employees, and schools if they had ≤7000 students studying in grades 5 to 7. We used covariate-constrained randomization to assign intervention facilities that received a hardware, management and monitoring support, and behavior change. Control facilities will receive the same or improved intervention after endline data collection. To evaluate the intervention, at baseline and endline, we used a self-reported survey, structured handwashing observations, and hand-rinse samples. At follow-up, hand-rinse samples were dropped. Starting from the intervention implementation, we collected longitudinal data on hygiene-related health conditions and absenteeism. We also collected qualitative data with focus group discussions and interviews. Data were analyzed descriptively and with random effect regression models with the random effect at a cluster level. The primary outcome for health centers is the handwashing rate, defined as the number of times health care workers performed good handwashing practice with soap or alcohol-based handrub at one of the World Health Organization 5 moments for hand hygiene, divided by the number of moments for hand hygiene that presented themselves during the patient interaction within an hour of observation. For schools, the primary outcome is the number of students who washed their hands before eating.

RESULTS

The baseline data collection across all countries lasted from February to June 2023. We collected data from 135 and 174 health care workers in Burkina Faso and Mali, respectively. In Nigeria, we collected data from 1300 students and in Palestine from 1127 students. The endline data collection began in February 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies investigating hand hygiene in primary health care centers and schools in protracted conflict settings. With our strong study design, we expect to support local policy makers and humanitarian organizations in developing sustainable agendas for hygiene promotion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946980 (Burkina Faso and Mali); https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05946980 and NCT05964478 (Nigeria and Palestine); https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05964478.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52959.

摘要

背景

在医疗保健中心和学校,手部卫生对于避免疾病传播至关重要。目前,对于长期冲突地区此类场所的手部卫生情况知之甚少。

目的

本方案旨在评估多组分手部卫生干预措施对洗手行为、潜在行为因素以及医护人员和学生健康状况的有效性。此外,我们将透明地报告我们的方法和统计分析计划。

方法

这是一项整群随机对照试验,在4个国家进行,为期1年,有2个平行组。在布基纳法索和马里,我们在每个国家的24个初级卫生保健中心开展工作,而在尼日利亚和巴勒斯坦,我们专注于每个国家的26所小学。如果设施未连接到正常运行的水源,但实施伙伴认为可以到达,则符合条件。此外,初级卫生保健中心若设有产科病房且有≥5名员工,学校若有≤7000名五至七年级的学生,则符合条件。我们采用协变量约束随机化方法来分配接受硬件、管理与监测支持以及行为改变的干预设施。对照设施将在终末数据收集后接受相同或改进的干预措施。为了评估干预效果,在基线和终末时,我们使用了自我报告调查、结构化洗手观察和洗手样本。在随访时,不再采集洗手样本。从干预措施实施开始,我们收集了与卫生相关的健康状况和缺勤情况的纵向数据。我们还通过焦点小组讨论和访谈收集了定性数据。数据采用描述性分析,并使用整群水平具有随机效应的随机效应回归模型进行分析。卫生中心的主要结局是洗手率,定义为医护人员在世界卫生组织的5个手部卫生关键时刻之一,使用肥皂或酒精类洗手液进行良好洗手的次数,除以观察一小时内与患者互动期间出现的手部卫生关键时刻的次数。对于学校,主要结局是饭前洗手的学生人数。

结果

所有国家的基线数据收集从2023年2月持续到6月。我们分别从布基纳法索的135名和马里的174名医护人员那里收集了数据。在尼日利亚,我们收集了1300名学生的数据,在巴勒斯坦收集了1127名学生的数据。终末数据收集于2024年2月开始。

结论

这是首批调查长期冲突地区初级卫生保健中心和学校手部卫生情况的研究之一。凭借我们强大的研究设计,我们期望支持当地政策制定者和人道主义组织制定可持续的卫生促进议程。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946980(布基纳法索和马里);https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05946980 以及 NCT05964478(尼日利亚和巴勒斯坦);https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05964478。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/52959。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/11024751/ff966d19dda3/resprot_v13i1e52959_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/11024751/9fa3f35b2877/resprot_v13i1e52959_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/11024751/ff966d19dda3/resprot_v13i1e52959_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/11024751/9fa3f35b2877/resprot_v13i1e52959_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/11024751/ff966d19dda3/resprot_v13i1e52959_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention on Hand Hygiene and Well-Being in Primary Health Care Centers and Schools Lacking Functional Water Supply in Protracted Conflict Settings: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.评估多组分干预措施对长期冲突地区缺乏功能性供水的初级卫生保健中心和学校手部卫生及健康状况的效果:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 3;13:e52959. doi: 10.2196/52959.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Factors perceived to facilitate or hinder handwashing among primary students: a qualitative assessment of the Mikono Safi intervention schools in NW Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西北部 Mikono Safi 干预学校小学生感知到的促进或阻碍洗手的因素:定性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 28;9(11):e030947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030947.
4
Effect of an equipment-behavior change intervention on handwashing behavior among primary school children in Kenya: the Povu Poa school pilot study.肯尼亚一项设备-行为改变干预对小学生洗手行为的影响:Povu Poa 学校试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6902-2.
5
School water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) intervention to improve malnutrition, dehydration, health literacy, and handwashing: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Metro Manila, Philippines.学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生(水卫教)干预措施改善营养不良、脱水、健康素养和洗手:菲律宾马尼拉大都会的一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):2034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14398-w.
6
Rinse-free hand wash for reducing absenteeism among preschool and school children.免洗洗手液可减少学龄前儿童和学生的缺勤率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012566.pub2.
7
Achieving optimal technology and behavioral uptake of single and combined interventions of water, sanitation hygiene and nutrition, in an efficacy trial (WASH benefits) in rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项效果试验(水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目)中,实现水、环境卫生、个人卫生和营养单一及联合干预措施的最佳技术应用和行为改变。
Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2710-8.
8
Examining school-based hygiene facilities: a quantitative assessment in a Ghanaian municipality.检查学校卫生设施:加纳市的定量评估。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5491-9.
9
A short, animated video to improve good COVID-19 hygiene practices: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一个用于改善良好 COVID-19 卫生习惯的简短动画视频:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04449-1.
10
Are there synergies from combining hygiene and sanitation promotion campaigns: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized trial in rural Tanzania.结合卫生与环境卫生促进活动是否具有协同效应:来自坦桑尼亚农村地区一项大规模整群随机试验的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0186228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186228. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline Characteristics of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Targeting Hand Hygiene in Primary Healthcare in Burkina Faso and Mali.布基纳法索和马里针对初级卫生保健中手部卫生的整群随机对照试验的基线特征
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 21;70:1608406. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608406. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Delivering water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review.为冲突环境中的妇女和儿童提供水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002064.
2
Conducting operational research in humanitarian settings: is there a shared path for humanitarians, national public health authorities and academics?在人道主义环境中开展运筹学研究:人道主义工作者、国家公共卫生当局和学者是否有共同的道路?
Confl Health. 2020 May 13;14:25. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00280-2. eCollection 2020.
3
Enhancing handwashing frequency and technique of primary caregivers in Harare, Zimbabwe: A cluster-randomized controlled trial using behavioral and microbial outcomes.
提高津巴布韦哈拉雷地区初级保健者的洗手频率和技术:使用行为和微生物学结果的整群随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;196:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
4
Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care.改善患者护理中手部卫生依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):CD005186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005186.pub4.
5
Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises.人道主义危机中的公共卫生干预措施的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2287-2296. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Contextual and psychosocial factors predicting Ebola prevention behaviours using the RANAS approach to behaviour change in Guinea-Bissau.在几内亚比绍,运用RANAS行为改变方法预测埃博拉预防行为的背景和社会心理因素。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 15;17(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4360-2.
7
Hand Hygiene Intervention Strategies to Reduce Diarrhoea and Respiratory Infections among Schoolchildren in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.发展中国家学童腹泻和呼吸道感染的手部卫生干预策略:一项系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 1;14(4):371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040371.
8
The Influence of Contextual and Psychosocial Factors on Handwashing.情境因素和社会心理因素对手部清洁的影响。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):1407-17. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0657. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
Social-cognitive factors mediating intervention effects on handwashing: a longitudinal study.介导洗手干预效果的社会认知因素:一项纵向研究
J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;38(6):956-69. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9661-2. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects.卫生与健康:全球洗手习惯的系统评价及健康影响更新
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Aug;19(8):906-16. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12339. Epub 2014 May 28.