Suppr超能文献

在生态恢复中混合不同物种并不总是正确的决定:在沙漠生态系统中,单一栽培比间作能提供更高的生态功能。

Combining different species in restoration is not always the right decision: Monocultures can provide higher ecological functions than intercropping in a desert ecosystem.

作者信息

Tariq Akash, Ullah Abd, Graciano Corina, Zeng Fanjiang, Gao Yanju, Sardans Jordi, Hughes Alice C, Zhang Zhihao, Peñuelas Josep

机构信息

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China; State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China; Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystems, Cele, 848300, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; CREAF, Cerdanyola Del Vallès, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China; State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China; Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystems, Cele, 848300, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;357:120807. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120807. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

Vegetation restoration in deserts is challenging due to these ecosystems' inherent fragility and harsh environmental conditions. One approach for active restoration involves planting native species, which can accelerate the recovery of ecosystem functions. To ensure the effectiveness of this process, carefully selecting species for planting is crucial. Generally, it is expected that a more diverse mix of species in the plantation will lead to the recovery of a greater number of ecosystem functions, especially when the selected species have complementary niche traits that facilitate maximum cooperation and minimize competition among them. In this study, we evaluated the planting of two native species from the hyper-desert of Taklamakan, China, which exhibit marked morpho-physiological differences: a phreatophytic legume (Alhagi sparsifolia) and a halophytic non-legume (Karelinia caspia). These species were grown in both monoculture and intercrop communities. Monoculture of the legume resulted in the highest biomass accumulation. Intercropping improved several ecosystem functions in the 50 cm-upper soil, particularly those related to phosphorus (P), carbon (C), and sulfur (S) concentrations, as well as soil enzyme activities. However, it also increased soil sodium (Na) concentration and pH. Halophyte monocultures enhanced ecological functions associated with nitrogen concentrations in the upper soil and with P, S, C, and cation concentrations (K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Zn, Co, Ni), along with enzyme activities in the deep soil. It also maximized Na accumulation in plant biomass. In summary, we recommend legume monoculture when the primary goal is to optimize biomass accumulation. Conversely, halophyte monoculture is advisable when the objective is to extract sodium from the soil or enhance ecosystem functions in the deep soil. Intercropping the two species is recommended to maximize the ecosystem functions of the upper soil, provided there is no salinization risk. When planning restoration efforts in desert regions, it is essential to understand the impact of each species on ecosystem function and how complementary species behave when intercropped. However, these interactions are likely species- and system-specific, highlighting the need for more work to optimize solutions for different arid ecosystems.

摘要

由于沙漠生态系统固有的脆弱性和恶劣的环境条件,沙漠植被恢复具有挑战性。一种主动恢复的方法是种植本地物种,这可以加速生态系统功能的恢复。为确保这一过程的有效性,仔细选择种植物种至关重要。一般来说,预计种植园中物种的更多样化组合将导致更多生态系统功能的恢复,特别是当所选物种具有互补的生态位特征,便于它们之间最大限度地合作并最小化竞争时。在本研究中,我们评估了来自中国塔克拉玛干超沙漠的两种本地物种的种植情况,它们表现出明显的形态生理差异:一种是深根豆科植物(疏叶骆驼刺)和一种盐生非豆科植物(花花柴)。这些物种分别种植在单作和间作群落中。豆科植物单作导致生物量积累最高。间作改善了50厘米上层土壤中的几种生态系统功能,特别是那些与磷(P)、碳(C)和硫(S)浓度以及土壤酶活性相关的功能。然而,它也增加了土壤钠(Na)浓度和pH值。盐生植物单作增强了与上层土壤中氮浓度以及与P、S、C和阳离子浓度(K、Ca、Mg、Cu、Fe、Zn、Co、Ni)相关的生态功能,以及深层土壤中的酶活性。它还使植物生物量中的钠积累最大化。总之,当主要目标是优化生物量积累时,我们建议采用豆科植物单作。相反,当目标是从土壤中提取钠或增强深层土壤中的生态系统功能时,建议采用盐生植物单作。如果没有盐渍化风险,建议将这两种物种间作,以最大限度地发挥上层土壤的生态系统功能。在规划沙漠地区的恢复工作时,必须了解每个物种对生态系统功能的影响以及间作时互补物种的表现。然而,这些相互作用可能因物种和系统而异,这突出表明需要开展更多工作来优化针对不同干旱生态系统的解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验