Wang Li, Geilfus Christoph-Martin, Sun Tao, Zhao Zichao, Li Wei, Zhang Xiaodong, Wu Xiaobin, Tan Deshui, Liu Zhaohui
State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China; National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying, 257345, China; Institute of Modern Agriculture on Yellow River Delta, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, 65366, Germany.
Chemosphere. 2023 Dec;344:140328. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140328. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
The increasing demand for environmentally friendly agricultural practices has driven the need for diversified crop cultivation to optimize crop productivity while minimizing carbon footprints (CFs). However, the impacts of crop diversification on crop production and environmental benefits are still poorly understood. In this study, conducted at two sites in the Yellow River Delta, China, we investigated the effects of legume intercropping, specifically maize/soybean (M/S) and maize/peanut (M/P) systems, on crop productivity, economic return, ecosystem economic budget (NEEB), CF, and carbon sustainability index (CSI) in comparison to conventional monocrops. Crops were grown in replicated field plots and fertilized in their strips according to common practice for monocrops. Compared to the expected averages of monocrops, maize/legume intercropping demonstrated higher crop yields, with M/S achieving a 37% and 43% increase at the two sites, respectively, and M/P achieving an 11% and 20% increase. The higher overyielding in M/S was attributed to stronger selection effects, i.e., interspecific facilitation. However, the complementarity effects induced by the competitive dominance of maize were similar in both intercropping systems. Additionally, M/S exhibited greater potential for improving net revenues compared to M/P. Life cycle assessments revealed lower CFs in the intercropping systems compared to monocultures. M/S reduced CFs per unit of area by 26.8% at both sites, CFs per unit of maize equivalent energy yield by 25% and 33%, and CFs per unit of revenue by 20% and 25% at the two sites, respectively. M/P also resulted in reduced CFs, albeit to a lesser extent. Intercropping enhanced the CSI, with the highest values observed in the M/S system. However, both intercropping systems showed limited effects on soil C sequestration. Overall, our results highlight that maize/legume intercropping is a feasible approach to enhance crop productivity while reducing CFs. The M/S system outperformed the M/P system in terms of crop yields, economic benefits, and CF reduction. However, the intercropping systems showed limited effects on SOC storage. This study provides important implications for sustainable agriculture by appropriate crop diversification.
对环境友好型农业实践的需求不断增加,促使人们需要进行多样化作物种植,以优化作物生产力,同时将碳足迹(CFs)降至最低。然而,作物多样化对作物生产和环境效益的影响仍知之甚少。在这项在中国黄河三角洲两个地点进行的研究中,我们调查了豆科作物间作,特别是玉米/大豆(M/S)和玉米/花生(M/P)系统,与传统单作相比,对作物生产力、经济回报、生态系统经济预算(NEEB)、CF和碳可持续性指数(CSI)的影响。作物种植在重复的田间地块中,并根据单作的常规做法在其条带中施肥。与单作的预期平均值相比,玉米/豆科作物间作表现出更高的作物产量,M/S在两个地点分别实现了37%和43%的增产,M/P实现了11%和20%的增产。M/S中较高的超产归因于更强的选择效应,即种间促进作用。然而,玉米竞争优势引起的互补效应在两种间作系统中相似。此外,与M/P相比,M/S在提高净收入方面表现出更大的潜力。生命周期评估显示,与单作相比,间作系统的CFs更低。M/S在两个地点每单位面积的CFs分别降低了26.8%,每单位玉米当量能源产量的CFs分别降低了25%和33%,每单位收入的CFs分别降低了20%和25%。M/P也导致CFs降低,尽管程度较小。间作提高了CSI,在M/S系统中观察到最高值。然而,两种间作系统对土壤碳固存的影响有限。总体而言,我们的结果表明,玉米/豆科作物间作是提高作物生产力同时降低CFs的可行方法。M/S系统在作物产量、经济效益和CFs降低方面优于M/P系统。然而,间作系统对土壤有机碳储存的影响有限。本研究通过适当的作物多样化为可持续农业提供了重要启示。