Suppr超能文献

仅使用 CHROMagar™ STEC 培养基不能在新西兰 Aotearoa 完全回收所有临床相关的产志贺毒素大肠埃希氏菌。

Using CHROMagar™ STEC medium exclusively does not recover all clinically relevant Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), Christchurch Science Centre, 27 Creyke Road, Ilam, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.

Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), Wallaceville Science Centre, 66 Ward Street, Wallaceville, Upper Hutt 5018, New Zealand.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2024 Apr 8;77(4). doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovae033.

Abstract

Diagnostic laboratories in Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ) refer cultures from faecal samples positive for Shiga toxin genes to the national Enteric Reference Laboratory for isolation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) for epidemiological typing. As there was variation in the culture media being referred, a panel of 75 clinical isolates of STEC, representing 28 different serotypes, was used to assess six commercially available media and provide guidance to clinical laboratories. Recommendations were subsequently tested for a 3-month period, where STEC isolations and confirmations were assessed by whole genome sequencing analysis against the culture media referred. CHROMagar™ STEC (CH-STEC; CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) or CH-STEC plus cefixime-tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar was confirmed inferior to CH-STEC plus blood agar with vancomycin, cefsulodin, and cefixime (BVCC). The former resulted in fewer STEC types (n = 18) being confirmed compared to those from a combination of CH-STEC and BVCC (n = 42). A significant (P < .05) association with an STEC's ability to grow on CH-STEC and the presence of the ter gene cluster, and eae was observed. Culturing screen positive STEC samples onto both CH-STEC and BVCC ensures a consistently higher recovery of STEC from all clinical samples in NZ than CH-STEC alone.

摘要

新西兰(NZ)的诊断实验室将粪便样本中志贺毒素基因阳性的培养物送到国家肠内参考实验室,以分离产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)进行流行病学分型。由于送检的培养基存在差异,使用了一组代表 28 种不同血清型的 75 株 STEC 临床分离株,以评估六种市售培养基,并为临床实验室提供指导。随后在 3 个月的时间里对建议进行了测试,通过对送检的培养基进行全基因组测序分析,评估 STEC 的分离和确认情况。CHROMagar™ STEC(CH-STEC;CHROMagar Microbiology,法国巴黎)或 CH-STEC 加头孢克肟-碲酸钾 Sorbitol MacConkey 琼脂被证实不如 CH-STEC 加万古霉素、头孢磺啶和头孢克肟血琼脂(BVCC)。前者确认的 STEC 类型(n=18)比 CH-STEC 和 BVCC 组合(n=42)确认的 STEC 类型少。观察到 STEC 在 CH-STEC 上生长的能力与 ter 基因簇和 eae 的存在之间存在显著关联(P<0.05)。对 CH-STEC 和 BVCC 培养阳性的 STEC 样本进行培养,可以确保从新西兰所有临床样本中更一致地回收 STEC,而不仅仅是 CH-STEC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验