• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study.人工智能驱动的神经植入物的伦理观:开发者视角——一项定性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4.
2
Nurses' perspectives on privacy and ethical concerns regarding artificial intelligence adoption in healthcare.护士对医疗保健领域采用人工智能的隐私和伦理问题的看法。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36702. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36702. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study.将伦理融入 AI 开发:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 23;25(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-01000-0.
4
The ethical significance of user-control in AI-driven speech-BCIs: a narrative review.人工智能驱动的语音脑机接口中用户控制的伦理意义:一项叙述性综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27;18:1420334. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1420334. eCollection 2024.
5
Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders.智能辅助技术使用的伦理问题:来自专业利益相关者定性研究的发现。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z.
6
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
7
Ethical considerations for integrating multimodal computer perception and neurotechnology.整合多模态计算机感知与神经技术的伦理考量
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 16;18:1332451. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1332451. eCollection 2024.
8
AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: a qualitative study on obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making.人工智能驱动的决策支持系统和认知依赖:一项关于妇产科医生和助产士如何将人工智能驱动的 CTG 纳入临床决策的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 6;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00990-1.
9
New and emerging technology for adult social care - the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology.成人社会关怀新技术——以具有人工智能 (AI) 技术的家庭传感器为例。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(9):1-64. doi: 10.3310/HRYW4281.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards clinical application of implantable brain-computer interfaces for people with late-stage ALS: medical and ethical considerations.迈向可植入脑机接口在晚期肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者中的临床应用:医学和伦理方面的考虑。
J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1323-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11464-6. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
The present and future of neural interfaces.神经接口的现状与未来。
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Oct 11;16:953968. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.953968. eCollection 2022.
3
Leaving Users in the Dark: A Call to Define Responsibilities toward Users of Neural Implanted Devices.让用户蒙在鼓里:呼吁明确对神经植入设备用户的责任
AJOB Neurosci. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):233-236. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2126545.
4
Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies: current applications, challenges, ethics and future prospects.大脑增强与神经科学技术:当前应用、挑战、伦理及未来前景。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:1000495. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1000495. eCollection 2022.
5
Post-trial access in implanted neural device research: Device maintenance, abandonment, and cost.植入式神经设备研究中的试验后获取:设备维护、废弃和成本。
Brain Stimul. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):1029-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.051. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Neurosurgical Team Acceptability of Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Two-Stage International Cross-Sectional Survey.神经外科学团队对脑机接口的接受度:一项两阶段国际横断面调查。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e884-e898. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.062. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
Ethical implications of visual neuroprostheses-a systematic review.视觉神经假体的伦理问题:系统评价
J Neural Eng. 2022 Apr 27;19(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac65b2.
8
Control and Ownership of Neuroprosthetic Speech.神经假体语音的控制与所有权
Philos Technol. 2021;34(3):425-445. doi: 10.1007/s13347-019-00389-0. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
On Neurorights.论神经权利。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:701258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258. eCollection 2021.
10
The ethics of explantation.移除植入物的伦理学问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00690-8.

人工智能驱动的神经植入物的伦理观:开发者视角——一项定性研究。

Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4
PMID:38570593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10991497/
Abstract

Convergence of neural implants with artificial intelligence (AI) presents opportunities for the development of novel neural implants and improvement of existing neurotechnologies. While such technological innovation carries great promise for the restoration of neurological functions, they also raise ethical challenges. Developers of AI-driven neural implants possess valuable knowledge on the possibilities, limitations and challenges raised by these innovations; yet their perspectives are underrepresented in academic literature. This study aims to explore perspectives of developers of neurotechnology to outline ethical implications of three AI-driven neural implants: a cochlear implant, a visual neural implant, and a motor intention decoding speech-brain-computer-interface. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with developers (n = 19) of AI-driven neural implants. Respondents shared ethically relevant considerations about AI-driven neural implants that we clustered into three themes: (1) design aspects; (2) challenges in clinical trials; (3) impact on users and society. Developers considered accuracy and reliability of AI-driven neural implants conditional for users' safety, authenticity, and mental privacy. These needs were magnified by the convergence with AI. Yet, the need for accuracy and reliability may also conflict with potential benefits of AI in terms of efficiency and complex data interpretation. We discuss strategies to mitigate these challenges.

摘要

神经植入物与人工智能 (AI) 的融合为新型神经植入物的开发和现有神经技术的改进带来了机遇。虽然这种技术创新为恢复神经功能带来了巨大的希望,但也带来了伦理挑战。人工智能驱动的神经植入物的开发者拥有关于这些创新带来的可能性、局限性和挑战的宝贵知识;然而,他们的观点在学术文献中代表性不足。本研究旨在探讨神经技术开发者的观点,概述三种人工智能驱动的神经植入物的伦理含义:人工耳蜗、视觉神经植入物和运动意图解码言语脑机接口。我们对人工智能驱动的神经植入物的开发者(n=19)进行了半结构化焦点小组讨论。受访者分享了与人工智能驱动的神经植入物相关的伦理问题,我们将这些问题分为三个主题:(1)设计方面;(2)临床试验中的挑战;(3)对用户和社会的影响。开发者认为人工智能驱动的神经植入物的准确性和可靠性是用户安全、真实性和精神隐私的条件。这种融合与人工智能相结合,放大了这些需求。然而,准确性和可靠性的需求也可能与人工智能在效率和复杂数据解释方面的潜在益处相冲突。我们讨论了减轻这些挑战的策略。