Suppr超能文献

门诊连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞对足部或踝关节手术患者(CAREFREE 试验)报告的镇痛整体获益的影响:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。

The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery (CAREFREE trial); a randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2024 Aug;95:111451. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111451. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Management of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. We hypothesized that usage of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care.

DESIGN

Single center, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

Tertiary hospital in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Patients were enrolled if ≥18 years and scheduled for elective inpatient foot or ankle surgery.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade or standard of care.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the difference in OBAS, which includes pain, side effects of analgesics, and patient satisfaction, measured daily from the first to the third day after surgery. A non-inferiority margin of 2 was set as the upper limit for the 90% confidence interval of the difference in OBAS score. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to analyze differences in OBAS scores over time. Secondary outcome was the difference in opioid consumption.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients were randomized to standard of care (n = 22), or ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade (n = 22). Analyzing the first three postoperative days, the OBAS was significantly lower over time in the ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade group compared to standard of care, demonstrating non-inferiority (-1.9 points, 90% CI -3.1 to -0.7). During the first five postoperative days, patients with ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade consumed significantly fewer opioids over time compared to standard of care (-8.7 oral morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -16.1 to -1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care with single shot popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia.

摘要

研究目的

足部和踝关节手术后的疼痛管理仍然是患者和医疗保健专业人员关注的问题。本研究旨在确定与标准护理相比,连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在接受足部或踝关节手术的患者的整体镇痛评分(OBAS)的整体获益方面的有效性。我们假设,连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞的使用不劣于标准护理。

设计

单中心、随机、非劣效性试验。

地点

荷兰的一家三级医院。

患者

如果患者年龄≥ 18 岁且计划接受择期住院足部或踝关节手术,则纳入患者。

干预

患者被随机分配到连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞或标准护理组。

测量

主要结局是 OBAS 的差异,包括疼痛、镇痛药物的副作用和患者满意度,从手术后第一天到第三天每天进行测量。设定 2 作为 OBAS 评分差异的 90%置信区间上限的非劣效性边界。采用混合效应模型分析 OBAS 评分随时间的差异。次要结局是阿片类药物消耗的差异。

主要结果

将患者随机分配至标准护理组(n=22)或连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞组(n=22)。分析前三天的术后数据,连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞组的 OBAS 随时间显著低于标准护理组,表明非劣效性(-1.9 分,90%CI -3.1 至 -0.7)。在术后五天内,连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞组的患者在口服吗啡等效剂量方面随时间的消耗明显少于标准护理组(-8.7 毫克;95%CI -16.1 至 -1.4)。

结论

连续门诊腘窝坐骨神经阻滞与单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞相比,在患者报告的整体镇痛获益方面不劣于标准护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验