NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.
Integrated Epilepsy Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Jun;9(3):1007-1020. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12929. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
Evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adult Asian patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS).
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EP0083; NCT03083665) evaluating BRV 50 mg/day and 200 mg/day in patients (≥16-80 years) with FOS with/without secondary generalization (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) despite current treatment with 1 or 2 concomitant antiseizure medications. Following an 8-week baseline, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, or BRV 200 mg/day, and entered a 12-week treatment period. Efficacy outcomes: percent reduction over placebo in 28-day FOS frequency (primary); 50% responder rate in FOS frequency; median percent reduction in FOS frequency from baseline; seizure freedom during treatment period (secondary). Primary safety endpoints: incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); TEAEs leading to discontinuation; serious TEAEs.
In this study, 448/449 randomized patients (mean age, 34.5 years; 53.8% female) received ≥1 dose of study medication (placebo/BRV 50 mg/BRV 200 mg/day: n = 149/151/148). Percent reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted FOS frequency was 24.5% (p = 0.0005) and 33.4% (p < 0.0001) with BRV 50 mg/day and 200 mg/day, respectively, 50% responder rate was 19.0%, 41.1%, and 49.3% with placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both BRV groups vs. placebo). Median percent reduction in FOS frequency from baseline was 21.3%/38.9%/46.7% in patients on placebo/BRV 50 mg/BRV 200 mg/day, respectively. Overall, 0, 7 (4.6%), and 10 (6.8%) patients were classified as seizure-free during the treatment period on placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively (p = 0.0146/p = 0.0017 for BRV 50 mg/200 mg/day vs. placebo, respectively). TEAE incidences were similar between patients on placebo (58.4%) and all patients receiving BRV (58.5%); TEAE incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 57.0% and 60.1%, respectively. Overall, 0.7% of patients on placebo and 2.0% of all patients on BRV reported serious TEAEs (incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively), 20.1% of patients on placebo and 33.1% of all patients on BRV reported drug-related TEAEs (incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 26.5% and 39.9%, respectively), and 4.7% of patients on placebo and 3.0% of all patients on BRV discontinued due to TEAEs (discontinuation incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 2.6% and 3.4%, respectively).
Adjunctive BRV was efficacious and well tolerated in adult Asian patients with FOS. Efficacy and safety profiles were consistent with BRV studies in predominantly non-Asian populations.
Brivaracetam is used to treat partial or focal seizures in people with epilepsy. Most studies with brivaracetam tablets have involved people from non-Asian racial backgrounds. In this study, 449 Asian adults with epilepsy took part. One third took 50 mg of brivaracetam, one third took 200 mg of brivaracetam, and one third took a placebo each day for 12 weeks. On average, those who took brivaracetam had fewer seizures than those given the placebo. Most of the side effects were mild and the number and type of side effects seen were as expected for this medication.
评估辅助应用溴维瑞胺(BRV)治疗伴有或不伴有继发性全面性发作(FOS)的局灶性发作(FOS)成年亚洲患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
这是一项 III 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(EP0083;NCT03083665),评估 BRV 50mg/天和 200mg/天在 FOS 患者(≥16-80 岁)中的疗效,这些患者在当前接受 1 或 2 种抗癫痫药物治疗的情况下仍有 FOS 发作(从局灶性到双侧强直阵挛发作)。在 8 周的基线期后,患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至安慰剂、BRV 50mg/天或 BRV 200mg/天组,并进入 12 周的治疗期。疗效结局:28 天 FOS 频率相对于安慰剂的降低百分比(主要终点);FOS 频率的 50%应答率;从基线开始 FOS 频率的中位数降低百分比;治疗期间的无发作率(次要终点)。主要安全性终点:治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率;导致停药的 TEAE;严重 TEAE。
在这项研究中,449/449 名随机患者(平均年龄 34.5 岁;53.8%为女性)接受了至少 1 剂研究药物(安慰剂/BRV 50mg/BRV 200mg/天:n=149/151/148)。28 天调整后 FOS 频率相对于安慰剂的降低百分比分别为 24.5%(p=0.0005)和 33.4%(p<0.0001),BRV 50mg/天和 200mg/天的 50%应答率分别为 19.0%、41.1%和 49.3%,与安慰剂相比,差异均有统计学意义(BRV 两组均 p<0.0001)。BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组患者 FOS 频率从基线的中位数降低百分比分别为 21.3%/38.9%/46.7%。总的来说,安慰剂、BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组在治疗期间分别有 0、7(4.6%)和 10(6.8%)例患者被归类为无发作(BRV 50mg/200mg/天与安慰剂相比,p=0.0146/p=0.0017)。安慰剂(58.4%)和所有接受 BRV 治疗的患者(58.5%)的 TEAE 发生率相似;BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组的 TEAE 发生率分别为 57.0%和 60.1%。总的来说,安慰剂组 0.7%的患者和所有接受 BRV 治疗的患者中有 2.0%报告了严重的 TEAE(BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组分别为 1.3%和 2.7%),安慰剂组 20.1%的患者和所有接受 BRV 治疗的患者中有 33.1%报告了与药物相关的 TEAE(BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组分别为 26.5%和 39.9%),安慰剂组有 4.7%的患者和所有接受 BRV 治疗的患者中有 3.0%因 TEAE 而停药(BRV 50mg/天和 BRV 200mg/天组的停药发生率分别为 2.6%和 3.4%)。
BRV 作为附加疗法对伴有 FOS 的亚洲成年患者有效且耐受良好。疗效和安全性特征与 BRV 在主要为非亚洲人群中的研究一致。