Coimbra Brendha Cação, Pereira Marina Alessandra, Cardili Leonardo, Alves Venancio Avancini Ferreira, de Mello Evandro Sobroza, Ribeiro Ulysses, Ramos Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille
Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246000, Brazil.
Department of Pathology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246000, Brazil.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):883-893. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.883.
Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer (GC). However, PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primary tumors (PT).
To compare PD-L1 status in PT and matched lymph node metastases (LNM) of GC patients and to determine the correlation between the PD-L1 status and clinicopathological characteristics.
We retrospectively reviewed 284 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy. PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (clone SP142) using the combined positive score. All PD-L1+ PT staged as pN+ were also tested for PD-L1 expression in their LNM. PD-L1(-) GC with pN+ served as the comparison group.
Among 284 GC patients included, 45 had PD-L1+ PT and 24 of them had pN+. For comparison, 44 PD-L1(-) cases with pN+ were included (sample loss of 4 cases). Of the PD-L1+ PT, 54.2% (13/24 cases) were also PD-L1+ in the LNM. Regarding PD-L1(-) PT, 9.1% (4/44) had PD-L1+ in the LNM. The agreement between PT and LNM had a kappa value of 0.483. Larger tumor size and moderate/severe peritumoral inflammatory response were associated with PD-L1 positivity in both sites. There was no statistical difference in overall survival for PT and LNM according to the PD-L1 status ( = 0.166 and = 0.837, respectively).
Intra-patient heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression was observed between the PT and matched LNM. This disagreement in PD-L1 status may emphasize the importance of considering different tumor sites for analyses to select patients for immunotherapy.
抗程序性死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1(PD-1/PD-L1)免疫疗法已在胃癌(GC)治疗中显示出有前景的结果。然而,PD-L1在转移部位和原发性肿瘤(PT)之间的表达可能不同。
比较GC患者PT和配对淋巴结转移灶(LNM)中的PD-L1状态,并确定PD-L1状态与临床病理特征之间的相关性。
我们回顾性分析了284例行D2胃切除术的GC患者。采用联合阳性评分法通过免疫组织化学(克隆号SP142)评估PD-L1。所有分期为pN+的PD-L1阳性PT也检测其LNM中的PD-L1表达。pN+的PD-L1阴性GC作为对照组。
在纳入的284例GC患者中,45例PT为PD-L1阳性,其中24例为pN+。作为对照,纳入44例pN+的PD-L1阴性病例(4例样本丢失)。在PD-L1阳性的PT中,54.2%(13/24例)的LNM也为PD-L1阳性。对于PD-L1阴性的PT,9.1%(4/44)的LNM为PD-L1阳性。PT和LNM之间的一致性kappa值为0.483。肿瘤体积较大和瘤周中度/重度炎症反应与两个部位的PD-L1阳性相关。根据PD-L1状态,PT和LNM的总生存期无统计学差异(分别为 = 0.166和 = 0.837)。
在PT和配对的LNM之间观察到患者体内PD-L1表达的异质性。PD-L1状态的这种不一致可能强调了在分析中考虑不同肿瘤部位以选择免疫治疗患者的重要性。