Alonso-Ovalle Luis, Menéndez-Benito Paula, Rubinstein Aynat
McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nat Lang Semant. 2024;32(2):135-176. doi: 10.1007/s11050-023-09218-9. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
How do modal expressions determine which possibilities they range over? According to the Modal Anchor Hypothesis (Kratzer in , Libraire Droz, Genève, 179-199, 2013), modal expressions determine their domain of quantification from particulars (events, situations, or individuals). This paper presents novel evidence for this hypothesis, focusing on a class of Spanish relative clauses that host verbs inflected in the subjunctive. Subjunctive in Romance is standardly taken to be licensed only in a subset of intensional contexts. However, in our relative clauses, subjunctive is exceptionally licensed in extensional contexts. At the same time, the interpretation of these relative clauses still involves modality, a type of modality that targets the goals of the agent of the main event. We argue that the pattern displayed by these relative clauses follows straightforwardly if subjunctive is associated with a modal operator that, like modal indefinites (Alonso-Ovalle and Menéndez-Benito in 35(1):1-41, 2017), can project its domain from a volitional event. Overall, our proposal supports the event-based analysis of mood (Kratzer in Evidential mood in attitude and speech reports. Talk delivered at the 1st Syncart Workshop, Siena, July 13, 2016; Portner and Rubinstein in 28:343-393, 2020) and extends its application beyond attitudinal and modal complements.