Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂的使用改善了轻度急性胰腺炎的预后:一项全国性队列研究。

Use of proton pump inhibitors improves outcomes in mild acute pancreatitis: A nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, WV, USA.

Department of General Surgery, Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 5;103(14):e37694. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037694.

Abstract

Previous studies showed a potential anti-inflammatory effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) as well as possible inhibition of pancreatic secretion. This presents the question of their possible use in acute pancreatitis (AP). Current clinical evidence does not address the role of PPI and the present review for possible therapeutic use and safety is lacking. Therefore, our study aims to address the role of PPI in the management of AP and their association with the different outcomes of AP. We queried the Diamond Network through TriNetX-Research Network. This network included 92 healthcare organizations. Patients with mild AP with Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score of Zero regardless of etiology were divided into 2 cohorts; 1st cohort included patients on PPI, and 2nd cohort included patients not on any PPI. Patients with BISAP score equal to or more than 1 or on PPI prior to the study date were excluded. Two well-matched cohorts were created using 1:1 propensity-scored matching model between cohorts. We compared the incidence of intensive care unit admission, mortality, and other associated complications. A total of 431,571 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 32.9% (n = 142,062) were on PPI, and 67% (n = 289,509) were not on any PPI. After propensity matching, the sample included 115,630 patients on PPI vs 115,630 patients not on PPI. The PPI group had a lower rate of mortality (3.7% vs 4.4%, P < .001), a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (3.9% vs 5.5%, P < .001), a lower rate of necrotizing pancreatitis (1.1% vs 1.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (3.6% vs 4.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of respiratory failure (2.8% vs 4.2%, P < .001), and a lower rate of acute kidney injury (6.9% vs 10.1%, P < .001). There was no statistical difference in the rate of Clostridium difficile infection between the 2 cohorts (0.9% vs 0.8%, P = .5). The use of PPI in mild AP with a BISAP-score of zero is associated with reduced pancreatitis-related complications and improved mortality. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

先前的研究表明质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 具有潜在的抗炎作用,并且可能抑制胰腺分泌。这就提出了它们在急性胰腺炎 (AP) 中的可能应用问题。目前的临床证据并未涉及 PPI 的作用,并且缺乏关于其可能治疗用途和安全性的综述。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨 PPI 在 AP 管理中的作用及其与 AP 不同结局的关系。我们通过 TriNetX-Research Network 对 Diamond 网络进行了查询。该网络包括 92 个医疗保健组织。无论病因如何,BISAP 评分均为零的轻度 AP 患者分为 2 个队列;第 1 个队列包括使用 PPI 的患者,第 2 个队列包括未使用任何 PPI 的患者。BISAP 评分等于或大于 1 分或在研究日期前使用 PPI 的患者被排除在外。使用队列间 1:1 倾向评分匹配模型创建了两个匹配良好的队列。我们比较了重症监护病房入住率、死亡率和其他相关并发症。共有 431,571 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,32.9%(n=142,062)使用 PPI,67%(n=289,509)未使用任何 PPI。在进行倾向评分匹配后,样本包括 115,630 名使用 PPI 的患者和 115,630 名未使用 PPI 的患者。PPI 组的死亡率较低(3.7% vs. 4.4%,P<.001),重症监护病房入住率较低(3.9% vs. 5.5%,P<.001),坏死性胰腺炎发生率较低(1.1% vs. 1.9%,P<.001),医院获得性肺炎发生率较低(3.6% vs. 4.9%,P<.001),呼吸衰竭发生率较低(2.8% vs. 4.2%,P<.001),急性肾损伤发生率较低(6.9% vs. 10.1%,P<.001)。两组之间艰难梭菌感染率无统计学差异(0.9% vs. 0.8%,P=.5)。在 BISAP 评分零的轻度 AP 中使用 PPI 与减少胰腺炎相关并发症和改善死亡率有关。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a78/10994513/8b620a116b39/medi-103-e37694-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验