• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅内动脉瘤管道栓塞装置治疗后自发延迟迁移或缩短:发生率、处理及危险因素

Spontaneous delayed migration or shortening after pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysm: incidence, management, and risk factors.

作者信息

Dong Linggen, Wang Chao, Wei Dachao, Peng Qichen, Wu Xinzhi, Chen Xiheng, Li Mingtao, Li Tong, Liu He, Zhao Yang, Duan Ran, Jin Weitao, Zhang Yukun, Wang Yang, Lv Ming

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Mar 17;17(4):368-374. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021535.

DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-021535
PMID:38580442
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies reporting spontaneous delayed migration or shortening (SDMS) after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of SDMS after PED treatment, propose management strategies, and identify the risk factors contributing to its occurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with an intracranial aneurysm (IA) treated with PEDs at three institutions. SDMS was classified as type I or II based on whether the PED covered the aneurysm neck.

RESULTS

The total cohort comprised 790 patients. SDMS was identified in 24 (3.04%) patients. Eighteen of the 24 patients had type I SDMS and did not require retreatment, while the remaining six patients had type II SDMS and all received retreatment. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the difference between the proximal and distal parent artery diameters (DPAD) (adjusted OR 2.977; 95% CI 1.054 to 8.405; P=0.039) and device tortuosity index (DTI) (adjusted OR 8.059; 95% CI 2.867 to 23.428; P<0.001) were independent predictors of SDMS after PED treatment, while the difference in length (DL) (adjusted OR 0.841; 95% CI 0.738 to 0.958; P=0.009) and PED plus coiling (adjusted OR 0.288; 95% CI 0.106 to 0.785; P=0.015) were protective factors.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of SDMS after PED treatment of IA was 3.04%. For patients with type I SDMS with incomplete aneurysm occlusion we recommend continuous imaging follow-up while, for patients with type II SDMS, we recommend aggressive retreatment. The DPAD and DTI were independent risk predictors of SDMS after PED treatment, while the DL and PED plus coiling were protective factors.

摘要

背景

关于使用Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)治疗后出现自发性延迟移位或缩短(SDMS)的研究有限。本研究旨在评估PED治疗后SDMS的发生率,提出管理策略,并确定其发生的危险因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了三家机构连续接受PED治疗的颅内动脉瘤(IA)患者。根据PED是否覆盖动脉瘤颈部,将SDMS分为I型或II型。

结果

总队列包括790例患者。24例(3.04%)患者出现SDMS。24例患者中有18例为I型SDMS,无需再次治疗,其余6例为II型SDMS,均接受了再次治疗。多因素logistic回归显示,近端和远端载瘤动脉直径差(DPAD)(调整后OR 2.977;95%CI 1.054至8.405;P=0.039)和装置迂曲指数(DTI)(调整后OR 8.059;95%CI 2.867至23.428;P<0.001)是PED治疗后SDMS的独立预测因素,而长度差(DL)(调整后OR 0.841;95%CI 0.738至0.958;P=0.009)和PED联合弹簧圈栓塞(调整后OR 0.288;95%CI 0.106至0.785;P=0.015)是保护因素。

结论

IA患者接受PED治疗后SDMS的发生率为3.04%。对于动脉瘤闭塞不完全的I型SDMS患者,我们建议持续进行影像学随访,而对于II型SDMS患者,我们建议积极进行再次治疗。DPAD和DTI是PED治疗后SDMS的独立风险预测因素,而DL和PED联合弹簧圈栓塞是保护因素。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous delayed migration or shortening after pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysm: incidence, management, and risk factors.颅内动脉瘤管道栓塞装置治疗后自发延迟迁移或缩短:发生率、处理及危险因素
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Mar 17;17(4):368-374. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021535.
2
Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large Chinese Cohort: Complication Risk Factor Analysis.Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗中国大样本颅内动脉瘤:并发症风险因素分析。
Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Apr;18(2):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
3
One and done? The effect of number of Pipeline embolization devices on aneurysm treatment outcomes.一次治疗还是多次治疗?Pipeline 栓塞装置数量对动脉瘤治疗结果的影响。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;26(2):147-155. doi: 10.1177/1591019919888130. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Age-related outcomes following intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a subgroup analysis of the IntrePED registry.使用Pipeline栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤后的年龄相关结果:IntrePED注册研究的亚组分析
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1726-30. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15327. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
Pipeline-assisted coiling versus pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤血流导向治疗中管道辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯管道置入的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;58:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.081. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Predicting Persistent Aneurysm Filling After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Model.预测颅内动脉瘤患者使用Pipeline栓塞装置治疗后动脉瘤持续充盈:列线图模型的构建与外部验证
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Apr;16(2):392-402. doi: 10.1007/s12975-023-01222-9. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
7
The Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Management of Recurrent Previously Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms.管道栓塞装置在复发性既往已栓塞脑动脉瘤治疗中的应用
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):692-7; discission 697. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000901.
8
Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis.用于治疗大型和巨大型未破裂颅内动脉瘤的管道栓塞装置与弹簧圈栓塞术:成本效益分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1749.
9
Prolapse of the Pipeline embolization device in aneurysms: incidence, management, and outcomes.管道栓塞装置在动脉瘤中的脱垂:发生率、处理及结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E16. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1738.
10
Predictors of occlusion, long-term outcomes, and safety in a cohort of 674 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device.在接受 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗的 674 个动脉瘤队列中,闭塞、长期结局和安全性的预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Jan 5;141(1):175-183. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.JNS231837. Print 2024 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of PED Flex and Lattice flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.PED Flex与网孔血流导向装置治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 14;16:1535044. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1535044. eCollection 2025.