Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Aug;68(7):983-988. doi: 10.1111/aas.14426. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly prescribed drugs for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. However, concerns have arisen about the possible harms of using PPIs, including potentially increased risk of pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and more seriously, an increased risk of death in the most severely ill patients. Triggered by the REVISE trial, which is a forthcoming large randomized trial comparing pantoprazole to placebo in invasively mechanically ventilated patients, we will conduct this systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PPIs versus no prophylaxis for critically ill patients.
We will systematically search randomized trials that compared gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis with PPIs versus placebo or no prophylaxis in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pairs of reviewers will independently screen the literature, and for those eligible trials, extract data and assess risk of bias. We will perform meta-analyses using a random-effects model, and calculate relative risks for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, and the associated 95% confidence intervals. We will conduct subgroup analysis to explore whether the impact of PPIs on mortality differs in more and less severely ill patients. We will assess certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
This systematic review will provide the most up-to-date evidence regarding the merits and limitations of stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs in critically ill patients in contemporary practice.
质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是预防危重症患者上消化道出血最常开的药物。然而,人们对使用 PPI 的潜在危害表示担忧,包括肺炎、艰难梭菌感染风险增加,更严重的是,对病情最严重的患者死亡风险增加。受到即将进行的大型随机试验 REVISE 的启发,该试验比较了泮托拉唑与安慰剂在接受有创机械通气的患者中的疗效,我们将进行这项系统评价,以评估 PPI 与无预防措施相比对危重症患者的疗效和安全性。
我们将系统地搜索比较 ICU 成人中使用 PPI 与安慰剂或无预防措施预防胃肠出血的随机试验。 pairs 对审查员将独立筛选文献,并对那些合格的试验,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们将使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并计算二分类结局的相对风险和连续结局的平均差异,以及相关的 95%置信区间。我们将进行亚组分析,以探讨 PPI 对死亡率的影响在病情更严重和不太严重的患者中是否不同。我们将使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
这项系统评价将提供有关在当代实践中使用 PPI 预防应激性溃疡的优缺点的最新证据。