Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;107:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
The clinical judgment of a physician is one of the most important aspects of medical quality, yet it is rarely captured with quality measures in use today. We propose a novel approach using individualized physician benchmarking that measures the appropriateness of care that a physician delivers by looking at their practice pattern in a specific clinical situation. A prime application of our novel approach to appropriateness measures is the surgical management of peripheral artery disease and claudication. We discuss 4 potential consensus metrics for the treatment of claudication that explore appropriateness of care of claudication management and are meaningful, actionable, and quantifiable. Given the multitude of medical specialties involved in the care of patients with peripheral artery disease and the consequences of both preemptive and delayed care, it is in all of our interests to promote data transparency with confidential communications to outlier physicians while advocating for evidence-based management.
医生的临床判断是医疗质量最重要的方面之一,但在当今使用的质量措施中,很少有对其进行评估。我们提出了一种新的方法,即使用个体化医生基准测试来衡量医生在特定临床情况下提供的护理的适当性,这种方法通过查看他们的实践模式来实现。我们的新方法在适当性措施中的一个主要应用是外周动脉疾病和跛行的手术管理。我们讨论了 4 种用于治疗跛行的潜在共识指标,这些指标探讨了跛行管理的护理适当性,并且是有意义的、可操作的和可量化的。考虑到外周动脉疾病患者的治疗涉及众多医学专业,以及提前和延迟治疗的后果,促进数据透明度,同时对异常值医生进行保密沟通,提倡基于证据的管理,这符合我们所有人的利益。