Suppr超能文献

血管质量改进计划中下肢血管疾病患者选择与治疗的区域差异

Regional variation in patient selection and treatment for lower extremity vascular disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

作者信息

Soden Peter A, Zettervall Sara L, Curran Thomas, Vouyouka Ageliki G, Goodney Philip P, Mills Joseph L, Hallett John W, Schermerhorn Marc L

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health Systems, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.06.105. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prior studies on the cause and effect of surgical variation have been limited by utilization of administrative data. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), a robust national clinical registry, provides anatomic and perioperative details allowing a more robust analysis of variation in surgical practice.

METHODS

The VQI was used to identify all patients undergoing infrainguinal open bypass or endovascular intervention from 2009 to 2014. Asymptomatic patients were excluded. The 16 regional groups of the VQI were used to compare variation in patient selection, operative indication, technical approach, and process measures. χ analysis was used to assess for differences across regions where appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 52,373 interventions were included (31%). Of the 16,145 bypasses, 5% were performed for asymptomatic disease, 26% for claudication, 56% for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLI) (61% of these for tissue loss), and 13% for acute limb-threatening ischemia. Of the 35,338 endovascular procedures, 4% were for asymptomatic disease, 40% for claudication, 46% for CLI (73% tissue loss), and 12% for acute limb-threatening ischemia. Potentially unwarranted variation included proportion of prosthetic conduit for infrapopliteal bypass in claudication (13%-41%, median, 29%; P < .001), isolated tibial endovascular intervention for claudication (0.0%-5.0%, median, 3.0%; P < .001), discharge on antiplatelet and statin (bypass: 62%-84%; P < .001; endovascular: 63%-89%; P < .001), and ultrasound guidance for percutaneous access (claudication: range, 7%-60%; P < .001; CLI: 5%-65%; P < .001). Notable areas needing further research with significant variation include proportion of CLI vs claudication treated by bypass (38%-71%; P < .001) and endovascular intervention (28%-63%; P < .001), and use of closure devices in percutaneous access (claudication; 26%-76%; P < .001; CLI: 30%-78%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation exists both in areas where evidence exists for best practice and, therefore, potentially unwarranted variation, and in areas of clinical ambiguity. Quality improvement efforts should be focused on reducing unwarranted variation. Further research should be directed at identifying best practice where no established guidelines and high variation exists.

摘要

目的

既往关于手术差异因果关系的研究因行政数据的使用而受到限制。血管质量倡议(VQI)是一个强大的全国性临床注册库,提供解剖学和围手术期细节,从而能够更全面地分析手术实践中的差异。

方法

利用VQI识别2009年至2014年期间所有接受腹股沟下开放旁路手术或血管内介入治疗的患者。排除无症状患者。VQI的16个区域组用于比较患者选择、手术指征、技术方法和流程指标方面的差异。在适当情况下,采用χ分析评估各区域之间的差异。

结果

共纳入52373例干预措施(占31%)。在16145例旁路手术中,5%用于无症状疾病,26%用于间歇性跛行,56%用于慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLI)(其中61%为组织缺损),13%用于急性肢体威胁性缺血。在35338例血管内手术中,4%用于无症状疾病,40%用于间歇性跛行,46%用于CLI(73%为组织缺损),12%用于急性肢体威胁性缺血。潜在不必要的差异包括:间歇性跛行患者腘下旁路手术中人工血管的使用比例(13% - 41%,中位数为29%;P <.001)、间歇性跛行患者单纯胫部血管内介入治疗(0.0% - 5.0%,中位数为3.0%;P <.001)、出院时使用抗血小板药物和他汀类药物(旁路手术:62% - 84%;P <.001;血管内手术:63% - 89%;P <.001)以及经皮穿刺时超声引导的使用情况(间歇性跛行:范围为7% - 60%;P <.001;CLI:5% - 65%;P <.001)。存在显著差异且需要进一步研究的明显领域包括:旁路手术治疗CLI与间歇性跛行的比例(38% - 71%;P <.001)以及血管内介入治疗的比例(28% - 63%;P <.001),以及经皮穿刺时闭合装置的使用情况(间歇性跛行:26% - 76%;P <.001;CLI:30% - 78%;P <.001)。

结论

在存在最佳实践证据且因此可能存在不必要差异的领域,以及临床存在模糊性的领域,均存在显著差异。质量改进工作应侧重于减少不必要的差异。进一步的研究应致力于在尚无既定指南且差异较大的领域确定最佳实践。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Description of a National Cohort of Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者全国队列的建立与描述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 19;2(4):100982. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100982. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验