Diagnostic value of lower extremity ultrasonographic nerve enlargement for differentiating demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We previously reported that nerve enlargement assessment by nerve ultrasonography of the intermediate upper limb is applicable for distinguishing demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, differences in the severity and distribution patterns of lower extremity nerve enlargement have not been established for either disease. Therefore, we examined the utility of lower extremity nerve ultrasonography for differentiating between CMT and CIDP.

METHODS

Twelve patients with demyelinating CMT and 17 patients with CIDP were evaluated. The median, ulnar, tibial, and fibular nerves were evaluated in three regions: the distal upper extremity, intermediate upper extremity, and lower extremity. Of the 14 selected screening sites, the number of sites that exhibited nerve enlargement (enlargement site number, ESN) in each region was determined.

RESULTS

The screening ESNs in the intermediate region and lower extremities were greater in patients with demyelinating CMT than in patients with CIDP and greater than the ESN in the distal region (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, and p = 0.101, respectively). The ESNs in the intermediate region and lower extremities significantly differed among patients with typical CIDP, CIDP variants, and demyelinating CMT (p = 0.084 and p < 0.001). Among the 14 selected screening sites, the combined upper and lower extremity ESNs exhibited the highest AUC (0.92; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the upper and lower extremities for ultrasonographic nerve measurement more accurately distinguishes CIDP from demyelinating CMT.