Suppr超能文献

复发或反应不佳的急性髓系白血病患者的缓解诱导与立即进行异基因造血干细胞移植(ASAP):一项随机、开放标签、3期、非劣效性试验。

Remission induction versus immediate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed or poor responsive acute myeloid leukaemia (ASAP): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Stelljes Matthias, Middeke Jan Moritz, Bug Gesine, Wagner-Drouet Eva-Maria, Müller Lutz P, Schmid Christoph, Krause Stefan W, Bethge Wolfgang, Jost Edgar, Platzbecker Uwe, Klein Stefan A, Schubert Jörg, Niederland Judith, Kaufmann Martin, Schäfer-Eckart Kerstin, Schaich Markus, Baldauf Henning, Stölzel Friedrich, Petzold Cathleen, Röllig Christoph, Alakel Nael, Steffen Björn, Hauptrock Beate, Schliemann Christoph, Sockel Katja, Lang Fabian, Kriege Oliver, Schaffrath Judith, Reicherts Christian, Berdel Wolfgang E, Serve Hubert, Ehninger Gerhard, Schmidt Alexander H, Bornhäuser Martin, Mikesch Jan-Henrik, Schetelig Johannes

机构信息

University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

University Hospital TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2024 May;11(5):e324-e335. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00065-6. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether high-dose cytarabine-based salvage chemotherapy, administered to induce complete remission in patients with poor responsive or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia scheduled for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after intensive conditioning confers a survival advantage, is unclear.

METHODS

To test salvage chemotherapy before allogeneic HSCT, patients aged between 18 and 75 years with non-favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia not in complete remission after first induction or untreated first relapse were randomly assigned 1:1 to remission induction with high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m intravenously, 1 g/m intravenously for patients >60 years or with a substantial comorbidity) twice daily on days 1-3 plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m intravenously) on days 3-5 or immediate allogeneic HSCT for the disease control group. Block randomisation with variable block lengths was used and patients were stratified by age, acute myeloid leukaemia risk, and disease status. The study was open label. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as complete remission on day 56 after allogeneic HSCT, with the aim to show non-inferiority for disease control compared with remission induction with a non-inferiority-margin of 5% and one-sided type 1 error of 2·5%. The primary endpoint was analysed in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the per-protocol population. The trial is completed and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02461537.

FINDINGS

281 patients were enrolled between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 12, 2022. Of 140 patients randomly assigned to disease control, 135 (96%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT, 97 (69%) after watchful waiting only. Of 141 patients randomly assigned to remission induction, 134 (95%) received salvage chemotherapy and 128 (91%) patients subsequently proceeded to allogeneic HSCT. In the ITT population, treatment success was observed in 116 (83%) of 140 patients in the disease control group versus 112 (79%) of 141 patients with remission induction (test for non-inferiority, p=0·036). Among per-protocol treated patients, treatment success was observed in 116 (84%) of 138 patients with disease control versus 109 (81%) of 134 patients in the remission induction group (test for non-inferiority, p=0·047). The difference in treatment success between disease control and remission induction was estimated as 3·4% (95% CI -5·8 to 12·6) for the ITT population and 2·7% (-6·3 to 11·8) for the per-protocol population. Fewer patients with disease control compared with remission induction had non-haematological adverse events grade 3 or worse (30 [21%] of 140 patients vs 86 [61%] of 141 patients, χ test p<0·0001). Between randomisation and the start of conditioning, with disease control two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and zero from treatment-related complications, and with remission induction two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and two from treatment-related complications. Between randomisation and allogeneic HSCT, patients with disease control spent a median of 27 days less in hospital than those with remission induction, ie, the median time in hospital was 15 days (range 7-64) versus 42 days (27-121, U test p<0·0001), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Non-inferiority of disease control could not be shown at the 2·5% significance level. The rate of treatment success was also not statistically better for patients with remission induction. Watchful waiting and immediate transplantation could be an alternative for fit patients with poor response or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia who have a stem cell donor available. More randomised controlled intention-to-transplant trials are needed to define the optimal treatment before transplantation for patients with active acute myeloid leukaemia.

FUNDING

DKMS and the Gert and Susanna Mayer Stiftung Foundation.

摘要

背景

对于计划在强化预处理后接受异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的反应不佳或复发的急性髓系白血病患者,给予基于大剂量阿糖胞苷的挽救性化疗以诱导完全缓解是否能带来生存优势尚不清楚。

方法

为了测试异基因HSCT前的挽救性化疗,将年龄在18至75岁之间、首次诱导后未完全缓解或未经治疗的首次复发的非低危急性髓系白血病患者按1:1随机分配,一组在第1 - 3天每天两次接受大剂量阿糖胞苷(3 g/m²静脉注射,60岁以上或有严重合并症的患者为1 g/m²静脉注射)诱导缓解,第3 - 5天加用米托蒽醌(10 mg/m²静脉注射),另一组疾病对照组立即进行异基因HSCT。采用可变区组长度的区组随机化,患者按年龄、急性髓系白血病风险和疾病状态分层。该研究为开放标签。主要终点为治疗成功,定义为异基因HSCT后第56天完全缓解,目的是显示与诱导缓解相比疾病控制的非劣效性,非劣效边际为5%,单侧I类错误为2.5%。在意向性治疗(ITT)人群和符合方案人群中分析主要终点。该试验已完成,并在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT02461537。

结果

2015年9月17日至2022年1月12日期间共纳入281例患者。在随机分配至疾病对照组的140例患者中,135例(96%)进行了异基因HSCT,其中97例(69%)仅在观察等待后进行。在随机分配至诱导缓解组的141例患者中,134例(95%)接受了挽救性化疗,随后128例(91%)患者进行了异基因HSCT。在ITT人群中,疾病对照组140例患者中有116例(83%)治疗成功,诱导缓解组141例患者中有112例(79%)治疗成功(非劣效性检验,p = 0.036)。在符合方案治疗的患者中,疾病对照组138例患者中有116例(84%)治疗成功,诱导缓解组134例患者中有109例(81%)治疗成功(非劣效性检验,p = 0.047)。ITT人群中疾病控制组与诱导缓解组治疗成功差异估计为3.4%(95%CI -5.8至12.6),符合方案人群中为2.7%(-6.3至11.8)。与诱导缓解组相比,疾病对照组3/4级或更严重的非血液学不良事件患者更少(140例患者中的30例[21%] vs 141例患者中的86例[61%],χ²检验p<0.0001)。在随机分组至预处理开始期间,疾病对照组有2例患者死于进行性急性髓系白血病,治疗相关并发症导致的死亡为零,诱导缓解组有2例患者死于进行性急性髓系白血病,2例死于治疗相关并发症。在随机分组至异基因HSCT期间,疾病对照组患者的住院时间中位数比诱导缓解组少27天,即住院时间中位数分别为15天(范围7 - 64天)和42天(27 - 121天,U检验p<0.0001)。

解读

在2.5%的显著性水平上未能显示疾病控制的非劣效性。诱导缓解患者的治疗成功率在统计学上也没有更好。对于有合适供体的反应不佳或复发急性髓系白血病的合适患者,观察等待和立即移植可能是一种替代方案。需要更多随机对照的意向性移植试验来确定活动性急性髓系白血病患者移植前的最佳治疗方案。

资助

DKMS和格特与苏珊娜·迈耶 Stiftung 基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验