van der Maas Niek G, Breems Dimitri, Klerk Clara P W, Pabst Thomas, Gradowska Patrycja, Thomas Abin, Biemond Bart J, Kuball Jurgen, Van Elssen Catharina H M J, Visser Otto, Vekemans Marie-Christiane, Graux Carlos, Maertens Johan, Knapper Steven, Dennis Mike, Freeman Sylvie, Thomas Ian, Beverloo H Berna, Huls Gerwin, Craddock Charles, Valk Peter J M, Vyas Paresh, Russell Nigel, Ossenkoppele Gert, Löwenberg Bob, Cornelissen Jan J, Versluis Jurjen
Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Hematology, Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom, Cadix Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Blood Adv. 2025 Aug 12;9(15):3853-3864. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015797.
Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may obtain remission upon induction chemotherapy, but relapse is frequent and associated with poor survival. Previous prognostic models for outcomes after relapse lacked analysis of comprehensive molecular data. A validated prognostic model integrating clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular variables may support treatment decisions. We studied 943 patients with AML who relapsed after intensive induction treatment in a development cohort (HOVON-SAKK). A random survival forest algorithm was used to evaluate the association of clinical parameters, cytogenetic abnormalities, and molecular variables at diagnosis with overall survival (OS). Relapsing patients (n = 377) who were enrolled in the NCRI-AML18 trial were used for validation. In the development cohort, the median age at relapse was 58 years, and patients were classified as 2022 European LeukemiaNet favorable (22%), intermediate (31%), and adverse risk (48%). One-third underwent allogeneic transplantation in the first complete remission. Variable selection yielded 9 variables associated with 1-year OS, including relapse-free interval, age, white blood cell count, mutated TP53, FLT3 internal tandem duplication, core-binding factor abnormalities, t(v;11q23)/KMT2A rearrangement, and complex/monosomal karyotype, which were assigned points according to their estimated hazard ratios. Three prognostic groups were defined with distinct 1-year OS in both development (favorable, 51% ± 3%; intermediate, 29% ± 3%; and poor, 14% ± 2%, respectively) and validation cohorts (51% ± 4%, 26% ± 5%, and 14% ± 3%, respectively). Validation confirmed the improved accuracy in predicting outcomes for patients with AML in first relapse. The revised AML relapse model improved on previous prognostic models for outcomes after first relapse. It provides stratification that might support tailoring second line treatment.
大多数急性髓系白血病(AML)患者在诱导化疗后可能获得缓解,但复发很常见且与生存率低相关。既往针对复发后结局的预后模型缺乏对全面分子数据的分析。一个整合临床、细胞遗传学和分子变量的经过验证的预后模型可能有助于支持治疗决策。我们研究了943例在强化诱导治疗后复发的AML患者,这些患者来自一个开发队列(HOVON-SAKK)。使用随机生存森林算法评估诊断时的临床参数、细胞遗传学异常和分子变量与总生存期(OS)的关联。纳入NCRI-AML18试验的复发患者(n = 377)用于验证。在开发队列中,复发时的中位年龄为58岁,患者被分类为2022年欧洲白血病网络定义的低危(22%)、中危(31%)和高危(48%)。三分之一的患者在首次完全缓解时接受了异基因移植。变量选择产生了9个与1年OS相关的变量,包括无复发生存期、年龄、白细胞计数、TP53突变、FLT3内部串联重复、核心结合因子异常、t(v;11q23)/KMT2A重排以及复杂/单体核型,根据它们的估计风险比为其赋值。定义了三个预后组,在开发队列(低危组1年OS为51%±3%;中危组为29%±3%;高危组为14%±2%)和验证队列(分别为51%±4%、26%±5%和14%±3%)中1年OS明显不同。验证证实了该模型对预测首次复发的AML患者结局的准确性有所提高。修订后的AML复发模型比既往针对首次复发后结局的预后模型有所改进。它提供了分层,可能有助于指导二线治疗的个体化。