DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Public Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 May;12(5):e793-e803. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00052-4. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
Tuberculosis, a major cause of death in people living with HIV, remains challenging to diagnose. Diagnostic accuracy data are scarce for promising triage and confirmatory tests such as C-reactive protein (CRP), sputum and urine Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra), and urine Determine TB LAM Ag (a lateral flow lipoarabinomannan [LF-LAM] test), without symptom selection. We evaluated novel triage and confirmatory tests in ambulatory people with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART).
897 ART-initiators were recruited irrespective of symptoms and sputum induction offered. For triage (n=800), we evaluated point-of-care blood-based CRP testing, compared with the WHO-recommended four-symptom screen (W4SS). For sputum-based confirmatory testing (n=787), we evaluated Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert). For urine-based confirmatory testing (n=732), we evaluated Xpert Ultra and LF-LAM. We used a sputum culture reference standard.
463 (52%) of 897 participants were female. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves for CRP was 0·78 (95% CI 0·73-0·83) and for number of W4SS symptoms was 0·70 (0·64-0·75). CRP (≥10 mg/L) had similar sensitivity to W4SS (77% [95% CI 68-85; 80/104] vs 77% [68-85; 80/104]; p>0·99] but higher specificity (64% [61-68; 445/696] vs 48% [45-52; 334/696]; p<0·0001]; reducing unnecessary confirmatory testing by 138 (95% CI 117-160) per 1000 people and number-needed-to-test from 6·91 (95% CI 6·25-7·81) to 4·87 (4·41-5·51). Sputum samples with Xpert Ultra, which required induction in 49 (31%) of 158 of people (95% CI 24-39), had higher sensitivity than Xpert (71% [95% CI 61-80; 74/104] vs 56% [46-66; 58/104]; p<0·0001). Of the people with one or more confirmatory sputum or urine test results that were positive, the proportion detected by Xpert Ultra increased from 45% (26-64) to 66% (46-82) with induction. Programmatically done haemoglobin, triage test combinations, and urine tests showed comparatively worse results.
CRP is a more specific triage test than W4SS in those initiating ART. Sputum induction improves diagnostic yield. Sputum samples with Xpert Ultra is a more accurate confirmatory test than with Xpert.
South African Medical Research Council, EDCTP2, US National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
结核病是导致艾滋病毒感染者死亡的主要原因之一,但其诊断仍然具有挑战性。对于有前途的分诊和确证试验,如 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、痰和尿液 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra(Xpert Ultra)以及尿液 Determine TB LAM Ag(侧向流脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖 [LF-LAM] 试验),缺乏针对症状选择的诊断准确性数据。我们评估了在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的门诊艾滋病毒感染者中使用新型分诊和确证试验。
招募了 897 名开始接受 ART 的感染者,无论症状和提供痰诱导如何。对于分诊(n=800),我们评估了即时护理基于血液的 CRP 检测,与世界卫生组织推荐的四项症状筛查(W4SS)进行比较。对于基于痰的确认性检测(n=787),我们评估了 Xpert Ultra 与 Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert)的比较。对于基于尿液的确认性检测(n=732),我们评估了 Xpert Ultra 和 LF-LAM。我们使用痰培养参考标准。
897 名参与者中有 463 名(52%)为女性。CRP 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.78(95%CI 0.73-0.83),W4SS 症状数的面积为 0.70(0.64-0.75)。CRP(≥10mg/L)与 W4SS 的敏感性相似(77% [95%CI 68-85;80/104] 与 77% [68-85;80/104];p>0.99),但特异性更高(64% [61-68;445/696] 与 48% [45-52;334/696];p<0.0001);每 1000 人可减少 138 次不必要的确认性检测(95%CI 117-160),从 6.91(95%CI 6.25-7.81)降至 4.87(4.41-5.51)。需要在 158 人(95%CI 24-39)中的 49 人(31%)中进行诱导的痰样本中,Xpert Ultra 的敏感性高于 Xpert(71% [95%CI 61-80;74/104] 与 56% [46-66;58/104];p<0.0001)。在具有一个或多个阳性确认性痰或尿液检测结果的人中,Xpert Ultra 检测的比例从 45%(26-64)增加到 66%(46-82)。
在开始接受 ART 的人群中,CRP 是比 W4SS 更具特异性的分诊试验。痰诱导可提高诊断效果。与 Xpert 相比,Xpert Ultra 的痰样本具有更高的准确性。
南非医学研究理事会、EDCTP2、美国国立卫生研究院-国家过敏和传染病研究所。