CAHAL, Center for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, location Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, CIBERCV and European Reference Network for Rare, Low Prevalence and Complex Diseases of the Heart (ERN GUARD Heart), Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 15;407:132027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132027. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
In patients with transposition of the great arteries and an arterial switch operation (TGA-ASO) right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction is a common complication requiring one or more RVOT interventions.
We aimed to assess cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and right ventricular function in patients stratified for type of RVOT intervention.
TGA-ASO patients (≥16 years) were stratified by type of RVOT intervention. The following outcome parameters were included: predicted (%) peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid Lateral Annular Systolic Velocity (TV S'), right ventricle (RV)-arterial coupling (defined as TAPSE/RV systolic pressure ratio), and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP).
447 TGA patients with a mean age of 25.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 21-29) years were included. Patients without previous RVOT intervention (n = 338, 76%) had a significantly higher predicted peak VO2 (78.0 ± 17.4%) compared to patients with single approach catheter-based RVOT intervention (73.7 ± 12.7%), single approach surgical RVOT intervention (73.8 ± 28.1%), and patients with multiple approach RVOT intervention (66.2 ± 14.0%, p = 0.021). RV-arterial coupling was found to be significantly lower in patients with prior catheter-based and/or surgical RVOT intervention compared to patients without any RVOT intervention (p = 0.029).
TGA patients after a successful arterial switch repair have a decreased exercise capacity. A considerable amount of TGA patients with either catheter or surgical RVOT intervention perform significantly worse compared to patients without RVOT interventions.
在大动脉转位(TGA)和动脉调转手术(ASO)的患者中,右心室流出道(RVOT)梗阻是一种常见的并发症,需要进行一次或多次 RVOT 介入治疗。
我们旨在评估根据 RVOT 介入治疗类型分层的 TGA-ASO 患者的心肺运动能力和右心室功能。
根据 RVOT 介入治疗类型对 TGA-ASO 患者进行分层。包括以下结果参数:预测(%)峰值摄氧量(peak VO2)、三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)、三尖瓣侧壁收缩期速度(TV S')、右心室(RV)-动脉偶联(定义为 TAPSE/RV 收缩压比)和 N 端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)。
共纳入 447 名 TGA 患者,平均年龄为 25.0(四分位距(IQR)21-29)岁。无既往 RVOT 介入治疗的患者(n=338,76%)预测的 peak VO2 显著更高(78.0±17.4%),而经单一介入导管 RVOT 干预、单一介入手术 RVOT 干预、以及多次 RVOT 介入治疗的患者分别为 73.7±12.7%、73.8±28.1%和 66.2±14.0%(p=0.021)。与无 RVOT 干预的患者相比,既往经导管和/或手术 RVOT 干预的患者 RV-动脉偶联明显较低(p=0.029)。
大动脉调转修复术后的 TGA 患者运动能力下降。相当一部分经导管或手术 RVOT 干预的 TGA 患者的表现明显差于无 RVOT 干预的患者。