Khetan Vatsal, Baxter Ian, Hampton Matthew, Spencer Amy, Anderson Alexander
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose District Hospital, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Apr 8;5(4):277-285. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0132.R1.
The mean age of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reduced with time. Younger patients have increased expectations following TKA. Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is the most common cause of failure of TKA in the UK. Interest in cementless TKA has re-emerged due to its encouraging results in the younger patient population. We review a large series of tantalum trabecular metal cementless implants in patients who are at the highest risk of revision surgery.
A total of 454 consecutive patients who underwent cementless TKA between August 2004 and December 2021 were reviewed. The mean follow-up was ten years. Plain radiographs were analyzed for radiolucent lines. Patients who underwent revision TKA were recorded, and the cause for revision was determined. Data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Island, the Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey (NJR) were compared with our series.
No patients in our series had evidence of radiolucent lines on their latest radiological assessment. Only eight patients out of 454 required revision arthroplasty, and none of these revisions were indicated for aseptic loosening of the tibial baseplate. When compared to data from the NJR annual report, Kaplan-Meier estimates from our series (2.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 5.87)) show a significant reduction in cumulative estimates of revision compared to all cemented (4.82 (95% CI 4.69 to 4.96)) or cementless TKA (5.65 (95% CI 5.23 to 6.10)). Our data (2.94 (95% CI 1.24 to 5.87)) also show lower cumulative revision rates compared to the most popular implant (PFC Sigma Cemented Knee implant fixation, 4.03 (95% CI 3.75 to 4.33)). The prosthesis time revision rate (PTIR) estimates for our series (2.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 3.83)) were lower than those of cemented cases (4.53 (95% CI 4.49 to 4.57)) from NJR.
The NexGen trabecular (tantalum) cementless implant has lower revision rates in our series compared to all cemented implants and other types of cementless implants, and its use in younger patients should be encouraged.
接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者平均年龄随时间有所降低。年轻患者对TKA术后的期望有所提高。在英国,胫骨部件的无菌性松动是TKA失败的最常见原因。由于在年轻患者群体中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,无骨水泥TKA再次受到关注。我们回顾了一系列接受翻修手术风险最高的患者使用钽小梁金属无骨水泥植入物的情况。
回顾了2004年8月至2021年12月期间连续接受无骨水泥TKA的454例患者。平均随访时间为10年。分析平片上的透亮线。记录接受翻修TKA的患者,并确定翻修原因。将来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰、马恩岛和根西岛国家关节注册中心(NJR)的数据与我们的系列进行比较。
在我们的系列中,没有患者在最新的放射学评估中有透亮线的证据。454例患者中只有8例需要进行翻修关节成形术,且这些翻修均不是因胫骨基板无菌性松动所致。与NJR年度报告的数据相比,我们系列的Kaplan-Meier估计值(2.94(95%置信区间(CI)1.24至5.87))显示,与所有骨水泥型(4.82(95%CI 4.69至4.96))或无骨水泥TKA(5.65(95%CI 5.23至6.10))相比,翻修的累积估计值显著降低。我们的数据(2.94(95%CI 1.24至5.87))也显示,与最常用的植入物(PFC Sigma骨水泥膝关节植入物固定,4.03(95%CI 3.75至4.33))相比,累积翻修率更低。我们系列的假体时间翻修率(PTIR)估计值(2.07(95%CI 0.95至3.83))低于NJR中骨水泥病例的估计值(4.53(95%CI 4.49至4.57))。
在我们的系列中,NexGen小梁(钽)无骨水泥植入物与所有骨水泥植入物和其他类型的无骨水泥植入物相比,翻修率更低,应鼓励在年轻患者中使用。