Matassi Fabrizio, Carulli Christian, Civinini Roberto, Innocenti Massimo
Orthopaedics Clinic, University of Florence, Italy.
Joints. 2014 Jan 8;1(3):121-5. eCollection 2013 Jul-Sep.
The question of whether to use cemented or cement-less fixation for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated. Discouraging preliminary results of cement-less TKAs have determined the worldwide use of cemented implants. However, with the development of biotechnologies and new biomaterials with high osteoconductive properties, biological fixation is now becoming an attractive option for improving the longevity of TKAs, especially in young patients. There is no evidence in the current literature to support the use of one method of fixation. The extensive clinical experience with cemented implants gathered over the years justifies their widespread use. New randomized clinical trials are necessary to compare cementless fixation based on the new ingrowth surfaces with standard cemented implants.
在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,使用骨水泥固定还是非骨水泥固定的问题仍存在争议。非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术初期令人沮丧的结果已决定了骨水泥型植入物在全球的使用。然而,随着生物技术以及具有高骨传导特性的新型生物材料的发展,生物固定目前正成为提高全膝关节置换术使用寿命的一个有吸引力的选择,尤其是对于年轻患者。目前文献中没有证据支持使用某一种固定方法。多年来积累的关于骨水泥型植入物的广泛临床经验证明了它们的广泛使用是合理的。有必要开展新的随机临床试验,将基于新型长入表面的非骨水泥固定与标准骨水泥型植入物进行比较。