Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Aug;23(8):2563-2573. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16304. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
This retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy rates in treating hypertrophic scars among four distinct groups of patients who either underwent fractional Erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser or microplasma radiofrequency technology as standalone treatments or in combination with compound betamethasone transdermal administration.
The study retrospectively examined 208 patients treated at our institution from April 2011 to December 2022 for hypertrophic scars, receiving no less than three treatments (with an interval of 8 weeks between each). The patients were categorized into four groups: the F group (treated with fractional Er:YAG laser), the F + B group (treated with fractional Er:YAG laser combined with compound betamethasone transdermal administration), the P group (treated with microplasma radiofrequency technology), and the P + B group (treated with microplasma radiofrequency technology combined with compound betamethasone transdermal administration). The therapeutic effects were evaluated based on the changes in the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores before and after treatment in these groups.
There was no statistically significant difference in the VSS scores among the four groups before treatment. After undergoing three sessions of the aforementioned four types of treatment, all groups showed a decrease in VSS scores, with average posttreatment VSS scores for the F group scored 5.15 ± 2.084, F + B group scored 3.7 ± 1.781, P group scored 4.41 ± 1.933, and P + B group scored 3.16 ± 1.775, respectively. With an increasing number of treatments, the total effective rate gradually increased in all four groups, and the combination treatment using compound betamethasone transdermal administration proved more effective than the standalone treatment.
All four treatments yielded favorable outcomes, with the combined therapy involving compound betamethasone transdermal administration proving more effective than the standalone treatments, meriting further clinical attention.
本回顾性研究旨在比较四种不同治疗组患者中治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效率,这些患者分别接受单纯分 192 铒激光或微等离子射频技术治疗,或联合复方倍他米松透皮给药治疗,或上述两种方法联合治疗。
本研究回顾性分析了 2011 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月在我院接受治疗的 208 例增生性瘢痕患者,所有患者均接受了至少 3 次治疗(每次治疗间隔 8 周)。将患者分为四组:F 组(接受分 192 铒激光治疗)、F+B 组(接受分 192 铒激光联合复方倍他米松透皮给药治疗)、P 组(接受微等离子射频技术治疗)和 P+B 组(接受微等离子射频技术联合复方倍他米松透皮给药治疗)。根据治疗前后温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分的变化,评估各组的治疗效果。
治疗前四组的 VSS 评分无统计学差异。接受上述四种治疗方法的 3 个疗程后,所有组的 VSS 评分均降低,F 组的平均治疗后 VSS 评分为 5.15±2.084,F+B 组为 3.7±1.781,P 组为 4.41±1.933,P+B 组为 3.16±1.775。随着治疗次数的增加,四组的总有效率逐渐升高,且联合使用复方倍他米松透皮给药的治疗效果优于单纯治疗。
四种治疗方法均取得了良好的效果,联合使用复方倍他米松透皮给药的治疗效果优于单纯治疗,值得进一步临床关注。