Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Apr 5;58:e20230343. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en. eCollection 2024.
To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes "Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult" and "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult", for patients with severe COVID-19.
Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group.
All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome "Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult" and 22 indicators "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult" were thus constructed.
The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.
分析针对严重 COVID-19 患者的“成人机械通气反应”和“成人机械通气撤机反应”护理结局的内容效度证据。
该方法学研究分两个阶段进行：文献回顾以构建指标定义，以及通过焦点小组分析护理结局的内容效度证据。
为 56 个指标制定的所有概念和操作定义都被认为是清晰和准确的。然而，有 17 个指标被排除，因为它们被认为不相关。因此，构建了护理结局“成人机械通气反应”的 17 个指标和“成人机械通气撤机反应”的 22 个指标的量值定义。
通过专家制定定义和验证，使这些结局及其指标的使用更加易懂和精确，有利于在临床实践中使用，并在评估和记录中提供更详细的信息。
