School of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Eye Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Apr 1;65(4):15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.4.15.
The purpose of this study was to understand how monocular luminance reduction affects binocular balance and examine whether it differentially influences fusion and mixed perception in amblyopia.
Twenty-three normally sighted observers and 12 adults with amblyopia participated in this study. A novel binocular rivalry task was used to measure the phase duration of four perceptual responses (right- and left-tilts, fusion, and mixed perception) before and after a neutral density (ND) filter was applied at various levels to the dominant eye (DE) of controls and the fellow eye (FE) of patients with amblyopia. Phase durations were analyzed to assess whether the duration of fusion or mixed perception shifted after monocular luminance reduction. Moreover, we quantified ocular dominance and adjusted monocular contrast and luminance separately to investigate the relationship between changes in ocular dominance induced by the two manipulations.
In line with previous studies, binocular balance shifted in favor of the brighter eye in both normal adults and patients with amblyopia. As a function of the ND filter's density, the duration of fusion and mixed perception decreased in normal controls, whereas that of fusion but not mixed perception increased significantly in patients with amblyopia. In addition, changes in binocular balance from luminance reduction were more significant in more balanced amblyopes or normal observers. Furthermore, shifts in binocular balance after contrast and luminance modulation were correlated in both normal and amblyopic observers.
The duration of fusion but not mixed perception increased in amblyopia after monocular luminance reduction in the FE. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that changes in ocular dominance from contrast-modulation and luminance-modulation are correlated in both normal and amblyopic observers.
本研究旨在探讨单眼亮度降低如何影响双眼平衡,并研究其是否对弱视的融合和混合感知产生差异影响。
本研究共有 23 名正常视力的观察者和 12 名弱视成人参与。使用一种新颖的双眼竞争任务来测量四个感知反应(右眼和左眼倾斜、融合和混合感知)的相位持续时间,在向对照组的优势眼(DE)和弱视患者的同眼(FE)施加不同水平的中性密度(ND)滤波器之前和之后。分析相位持续时间以评估单眼亮度降低后融合或混合感知的持续时间是否发生变化。此外,我们量化了眼优势,并分别调整了单眼对比度和亮度,以研究这两种操作引起的眼优势变化之间的关系。
与之前的研究一致,在正常成年人和弱视患者中,双眼平衡都向更亮的眼睛倾斜。随着 ND 滤波器密度的增加,正常对照组的融合和混合感知持续时间减少,而弱视患者的融合持续时间显著增加,但混合感知持续时间没有明显变化。此外,在更平衡的弱视患者或正常观察者中,由于亮度降低引起的双眼平衡变化更为显著。此外,在正常和弱视观察者中,对比度和亮度调制后的双眼平衡变化相关。
在 FE 中的单眼亮度降低后,弱视患者的融合持续时间增加,但混合感知持续时间没有增加。此外,我们的发现表明,正常和弱视观察者的对比度调制和亮度调制引起的眼优势变化相关。