Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Apr;153(4):1038-1052. doi: 10.1037/xge0001538.
We often assume that travel direction is redundant with head direction, but from first principles, these two factors provide differing spatial information. Although head direction has been found to be a fundamental component of human navigation, it is unclear how self-motion signals for travel direction contribute to forming a travel trajectory. Employing a novel motion adaptation paradigm from visual neuroscience designed to preclude a contribution of head direction, we found high-level aftereffects of perceived travel direction, indicating that travel direction is a fundamental component of human navigation. Interestingly, we discovered a higher frequency of reporting perceived travel toward the adapted direction compared to a no-adapt control-an aftereffect that runs contrary to low-level motion aftereffects. This travel aftereffect was maintained after controlling for possible response biases and approaching effects, and it scaled with adaptation duration. These findings demonstrate the first evidence of how a pure travel direction signal might be represented in humans, independent of head direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们通常认为行进方向与头朝向是冗余的,但从基本原则出发,这两个因素提供了不同的空间信息。尽管已经发现头朝向是人类导航的基本组成部分,但不清楚行进方向的自我运动信号如何有助于形成行进轨迹。我们采用了一种新颖的来自视觉神经科学的运动适应范式,旨在排除头朝向的贡献,发现了感知行进方向的高级后效,表明行进方向是人类导航的基本组成部分。有趣的是,与无适应对照相比,我们发现报告感知到的朝着适应方向行进的频率更高——这种后效与低水平运动后效相反。在控制可能的反应偏差和趋近效应后,这种行进后效得以维持,并且与适应持续时间成正比。这些发现首次证明了在人类中如何独立于头朝向来表示纯行进方向信号。