Universite de Lille, Laboratory of Cognitive and Affective Sciences (SCALab UMR CNRS 9193).
State University of New York at Binghamton, Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2024 Apr;50(2):99-117. doi: 10.1037/xan0000376.
According to the cycle/trial (C/T) rule, the rate of associative learning is a function of the ratio between the overall rate of U.S. presentation (C) and its rate in the presence of the conditioned stimulus (CS; [T]). This rule is well supported in studies with nonhumans. The present study was conducted to test whether it also applies to human contingency learning. In Experiment 1, participants were exposed to rapid streams of trials. Sensitivity to the cue-outcome contingency varied with both intertrial interval (ITI, which captures C) and cue duration, but the C/T rule was not respected, notably because the effect of ITI was much larger than the effect of cue duration. Experiment 2 showed that mere suppression of verbal strategies did not alter the magnitude of the ITI effect. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 1 but with cue duration and ITI varied between 1,000 and 3,000 ms instead of between 100 and 1,000 ms. Performance was insensitive to both cue duration and ITI. This was not the consequence of Experiment 3 only varying the cue duration to ITI ratio by a factor of 3; in Experiment 4 where the cue duration was 100 ms, a 300-ms ITI was sufficient to observe an ITI effect. The lack of an ITI effect with a 1,000-ms cue and an ITI varying between 1,000 and 3,000 ms was replicated in Experiment 5. These results are discussed in light of how processes underlying associative learning might break down when events occur very rapidly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
根据周期/试验(C/T)规则,联想学习的速度是美国呈现的总体速度(C)与其在条件刺激(CS;[T])存在下的速度之比的函数。该规则在非人类研究中得到了很好的支持。本研究旨在检验它是否也适用于人类的伴随学习。在实验 1 中,参与者接触到快速的试验流。对线索-结果关联的敏感性既与试验间间隔(ITI,捕捉 C)和线索持续时间有关,也与 C/T 规则不符,特别是因为 ITI 的影响比线索持续时间的影响大得多。实验 2 表明,仅仅抑制言语策略并不能改变 ITI 效应的大小。实验 3 复制了实验 1,但线索持续时间和 ITI 分别在 1000 和 3000 毫秒之间变化,而不是在 100 和 1000 毫秒之间变化。性能对线索持续时间和 ITI 都不敏感。这并不是实验 3 只通过将线索持续时间与 ITI 比值变化 3 倍的结果;在实验 4 中,当线索持续时间为 100 毫秒时,300 毫秒的 ITI 足以观察到 ITI 效应。在实验 5 中,当线索为 1000 毫秒且 ITI 在 1000 至 3000 毫秒之间变化时,缺乏 ITI 效应得到了复制。这些结果在考虑到联想学习的潜在过程在事件发生非常迅速时如何瓦解的情况下进行了讨论。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。