• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理不应期效应的瓶颈涉及反应启动的时间而不是反应选择。

The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA, USA.

School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):29-47. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1498-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-018-1498-6
PMID:29971643
Abstract

The Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) effect is a delay in responding that is assumed to be caused by a bottleneck that prevents preparation of a second action until preparation of the previous action has been completed. The bottleneck is usually attributed to a limitation that prevents concurrent selection of two responses. However, evidence reviewed here challenges this selection interpretation. We propose instead that the bottleneck is due to a process that programs the timing of response initiation, and which must be completed immediately prior to responding. This hypothesis is based on two conclusions from recent developments in research, which includes findings from paradigms that do not involve the PRP. The first conclusion is from studies involving the startle response and single-task simple (precued) reaction time; these studies indicate that programming the timing of response onsets is needed to enable response initiation. This programing takes longer for more complicated timing, and must be delayed until just prior to responding. The second conclusion is from studies of concurrent rhythmic movements demonstrating that the representation of timing is restricted to one temporal frame unless very rapid performance enables parallel timing. These findings reveal limitations that can combine to produce the PRP bottleneck. This interpretation clarifies otherwise puzzling aspects of the PRP effect and indicates that a fundamental restriction concerning response timing may underlie both limitations and the PRP effect that they produce. This restriction might arise because timing is controlled by subcortical neural structures with limited working memory.

摘要

心理不应期(PRP)效应是一种反应延迟,据假设是由于瓶颈导致的,该瓶颈阻止了第二个动作的准备,直到前一个动作的准备完成。瓶颈通常归因于限制,防止同时选择两个反应。然而,这里回顾的证据挑战了这种选择解释。相反,我们提出瓶颈是由于一个过程造成的,该过程编程了响应启动的时间,并且必须在响应之前立即完成。该假设基于最近研究进展中的两个结论,其中包括不涉及 PRP 的范式的发现。第一个结论来自涉及惊跳反应和单任务简单(预先提示)反应时间的研究;这些研究表明,编程响应开始的时间是需要的,以能够进行响应启动。对于更复杂的时间,这种编程需要更长的时间,并且必须延迟到响应之前。第二个结论来自于对同时进行的节奏运动的研究,表明除非非常快速的表现允许并行计时,否则计时的表示仅限于一个时间框架。这些发现揭示了可以组合在一起产生 PRP 瓶颈的限制。这种解释澄清了 PRP 效应的其他令人困惑的方面,并表明关于响应时间的基本限制可能是产生这些限制和 PRP 效应的基础。这种限制可能是由于由具有有限工作记忆的皮质下神经结构控制的时间造成的。

相似文献

1
The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.心理不应期效应的瓶颈涉及反应启动的时间而不是反应选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):29-47. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1498-6.
2
Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.双重任务执行过程中反应准备瓶颈的证据:突发听觉刺激对心理不应期的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
3
A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.一个令人吃惊的听觉刺激会干扰即将到来的运动准备:惊吓不应期的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jun;158:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
4
Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?中枢瓶颈是否包含基于享乐主义的选择的自主选择?
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(5):313-21. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.313.
5
The psychological refractory period of stopping.停止的心理不应期。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):965-81. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.965.
6
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.注意瞬脱和心理不应期的共同皮层瓶颈。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2883-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.063. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
Programming of action timing cannot be completed until immediately prior to initiation of the response to be controlled.动作定时编程无法在需要控制的反应开始之前完成。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):821-832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01740-9.
8
Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.双重任务执行中对自身反应时间的时间辨别:情境效应与方法学限制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Aug;78(6):1806-16. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1161-0.
9
The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes.胼胝体切开术后的心理不应期效应:侧化反应编码的解耦
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Apr;24(2):463-80. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.463.
10
Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.心理不应期(PRP)范式中的资源共享证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Nov;48(11):1279-1293. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001052. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Sequential Kicks on Programming Time and Movement Time in Taekwondo.跆拳道中连续踢腿对编程时间和动作时间的影响。
J Hum Kinet. 2025 Jun 25;98:5-15. doi: 10.5114/jhk/194067. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Always in (partner) action? Working in teams may improve simulated flight performance-but only in the apt cognitive control state.总是处于(伙伴)行动中?团队合作可能会提高模拟飞行表现——但前提是处于恰当的认知控制状态。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 2;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00633-6.
3
Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony on cognitive control in healthy adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.定时结构的准备工作涉及两个独立的子过程。
Psychol Res. 2018 Sep;82(5):981-996. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0877-3. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.多任务范式中准备与在线处理的分离限制:资源模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000277. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Parallel streams versus integrated timing in multilimb pattern generation: A test of Korte's Third Law.
刺激起始异步对健康成年人认知控制的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 17;19(7):e0306609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306609. eCollection 2024.
4
The temporal dynamics of task processing and choice in a novel multitasking paradigm.在一种新颖的多重任务范式中任务处理和选择的时间动态。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1737-1757. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01971-8. Epub 2024 May 11.
5
Cue duration and trial spacing effects in contingency assessment in the streaming procedure with humans.线索时长和试验间隔效应对人类连续过程中应急评估的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2024 Apr;50(2):99-117. doi: 10.1037/xan0000376.
6
A mechanism underlying improved dual-task performance after practice: Reviewing evidence for the memory hypothesis.练习后改善双重任务表现的潜在机制:回顾记忆假说的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2005-2021. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02498-0. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
A reservoir of foraging decision variables in the mouse brain.鼠脑觅食决策变量库。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 May;26(5):840-849. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01305-8. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.预备时间长短对连续瞄准运动的准备和控制的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Feb;77(2):242-256. doi: 10.1177/17470218231162617. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
9
Efficacy of mechanisms of neuroplasticity after a stroke.中风后神经可塑性机制的疗效。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2022;40(2):73-84. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211227.
10
A Neuro-Computational Model for Discrete-Continuous Dual-Task Process.一种用于离散 - 连续双任务过程的神经计算模型。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Mar 29;16:829807. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.829807. eCollection 2022.
多肢体模式生成中的并行流与整合定时:对科特第三定律的检验
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Nov;42(11):1703-1715. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000263. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Independent planning of timing and sequencing for complex movements.复杂动作的时间和顺序的独立规划。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1158-72. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000220. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
5
Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking.双重任务中反向串扰和任务屏蔽的顺序调制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):631-47. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000170. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
A comparison of the psychological refractory period and prioritized processing paradigms: Can the response-selection bottleneck model explain them both?心理不应期与优先加工范式的比较:反应选择瓶颈模型能否同时解释二者?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1420-41. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000103. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.一个令人吃惊的听觉刺激会干扰即将到来的运动准备:惊吓不应期的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jun;158:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
8
Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?小的双任务成本反映的是观念运动兼容性还是不存在串扰?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1403-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0813-8.
9
One version of direct response priming requires automatization of the relevant associations but not awareness of the prime.直接反应启动的一种形式需要相关联想的自动化,但不需要对启动刺激的意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jul;34:163-75. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.反应时间的控制在简单反应时期间发生,但在选择反应时中是在线进行的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2005-21. doi: 10.1037/a0037522. Epub 2014 Jul 28.