Technol Cult. 2023;64(3):707-736. doi: 10.1353/tech.2023.a903970.
A true history of industrial technology and innovation must factor in the history of labor and skill required to make a specific product. Mainstream perspectives on industrialization in Britain's cotton industry view technological change in spinning as motivated by productivity gains, facilitated by the fortuitous availability of high-quality, long-staple cotton. However, material evidence shows British cotton textiles advanced to match Indian cloth quality, suggesting that spinning machinery also evolved apace to achieve product quality. This article demonstrates that alongside the cotton staple, the spinner's skill and dexterity determined final cloth quality. The three main spinning machines were technically path dependent, with mechanized spinning of fine cotton based on the original Indian jersey wheel technology. Technological innovations mainly focused on improving product quality, with mechanization a means to bridge the British skill gap in cotton spinning. Histories of labor and skill are therefore at the heart of innovation.
真正的工业技术和创新历史必须考虑到生产特定产品所需的劳动力和技能历史。英国棉纺织业工业化的主流观点认为,纺纱技术的变革是由生产力的提高推动的,而高质量、长纤维棉花的偶然供应则为其提供了便利。然而,实物证据表明,英国棉纺织品的进步是为了与印度布料的质量相匹配,这表明纺纱机械也在飞速发展,以达到产品质量的要求。本文表明,除了棉花这一主要因素外,纺纱工的技能和灵巧程度也决定了最终布料的质量。三种主要的纺纱机在技术上存在路径依赖性,细纱的机械化生产基于最初的印度泽西轮技术。技术创新主要集中在提高产品质量上,机械化是弥合英国在棉纺方面技能差距的一种手段。因此,劳动力和技能的历史是创新的核心。