Technol Cult. 2022;63(2):349-376. doi: 10.1353/tech.2022.0050.
Since the 1950s, historians have sought to explain industrial modernization in Meiji Japan as a model for developing countries. They typically attribute Japan's success to single factors such as accumulated knowledge or capital, visionary leadership, or technological choice. This article moves beyond mono-causality to examine technology transfer's role in industrial modernization. Tomioka Silk Filature and Osaka Cotton Spinning Mill make the case that components of industrialization were interrelated and a new socio-technological system was essential for technology transfer to affect a Kuhnian-style paradigm shift. Tomioka is an example of ad hoc industrialization, the gradual integration of transferred technologies, and creation of associated regimes leading to a new socio-technological system. In contrast, Osaka Cotton Mill embodies the creation of a new industrial paradigm for Japanese industry, demonstrating the essentiality of integrating numerous socio-technological elements such as adapted artifacts, bio-materials, accumulated knowledge, factory management, and geographic location.
自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,历史学家一直试图将明治时期日本的工业现代化解释为发展中国家的典范。他们通常将日本的成功归因于单一因素,如知识或资本的积累、有远见的领导或技术选择。本文超越了单一因果关系,探讨了技术转让在工业现代化中的作用。富冈缫丝厂和大阪棉纺厂的案例表明,工业化的组成部分是相互关联的,需要建立一个新的社会技术系统,才能使技术转让影响库恩式的范式转变。富冈是临时工业化的一个例子,即逐渐整合转让的技术,并创建相关制度,从而形成一个新的社会技术系统。相比之下,大阪棉纺厂体现了日本工业新的工业范式的创造,展示了整合大量社会技术要素的必要性,如适应的人工制品、生物材料、积累的知识、工厂管理和地理位置。