Koch Ulrich
Bull Hist Med. 2023;97(1):127-156. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2023.0009.
This article situates the emergence of sensationalized news reports of "infant addicts" and the concurrently evolving study of neonatal drug withdrawal within the context of the expansion of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in the United States. It details how, in the early 1970s, concerns about pregnant narcotic addicts and their infants became part of the politically charged debate over methadone maintenance. The popular press amplified the apprehensions of a vocal group of pediatricians who saw in infants' withdrawal an indication of methadone's inherent harmfulness and potential toxicity. Increased access to MMT and its presumed normalizing effects on reproductive functions augmented these concerns. The ensuing controversy led clinical researchers to define, measure, and systematically study "neonatal abstinence syndrome," whereas the emerging media trope of the infant drug addict effectively undermined the claims made by MMT's proponents about the drug's therapeutic utility.
本文将轰动性的“婴儿成瘾者”新闻报道的出现以及新生儿戒断综合征的研究置于美国美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)扩张的背景下。本文详细介绍了在 20 世纪 70 年代初期,对怀孕的麻醉品成瘾者及其婴儿的担忧如何成为美沙酮维持治疗的政治争论的一部分。大众媒体放大了一群儿科医生的担忧,他们认为婴儿戒断是美沙酮内在的有害性和潜在毒性的迹象。更多地使用 MMT 及其对生殖功能的预期正常化作用增加了这些担忧。由此引发的争议促使临床研究人员定义、测量和系统地研究“新生儿戒断综合征”,而新兴媒体中婴儿吸毒者的形象有效地破坏了 MMT 支持者对该药物治疗效果的说法。