Evans Christopher S, Bunn Barry, Reeder Timothy, Patterson Leigh, Gertsch Dustin, Medford Richard J
Information Services, ECU Health, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):397-403. doi: 10.1055/a-2301-7496. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Clinical documentation is essential for conveying medical decision-making, communication between providers and patients, and capturing quality, billing, and regulatory measures during emergency department (ED) visits. Growing evidence suggests the benefits of note template standardization; however, variations in documentation practices are common. The primary objective of this study is to measure the utilization and coding performance of a standardized ED note template implemented across a nine-hospital health system.
This was a retrospective study before and after the implementation of a standardized ED note template. A multi-disciplinary group consensus was built around standardized note elements, provider note workflows within the electronic health record (EHR), and how to incorporate newly required medical decision-making elements. The primary outcomes measured included the proportion of ED visits using standardized note templates, and the distribution of billing codes in the 6 months before and after implementation.
In the preimplementation period, a total of six legacy ED note templates were being used across nine EDs, with the most used template accounting for approximately 36% of ED visits. Marked variations in documentation elements were noted across six legacy templates. After the implementation, 82% of ED visits system-wide used a single standardized note template. Following implementation, we observed a 1% increase in the proportion of ED visits coded as highest acuity and an unchanged proportion coded as second highest acuity.
We observed a greater than twofold increase in the use of a standardized ED note template across a nine-hospital health system in anticipation of the new 2023 coding guidelines. The development and utilization of a standardized note template format relied heavily on multi-disciplinary stakeholder engagement to inform design that worked for varied documentation practices within the EHR. After the implementation of a standardized note template, we observed better-than-anticipated coding performance.
临床文档对于传达医疗决策、医护人员与患者之间的沟通以及在急诊科就诊期间记录质量、计费和监管措施至关重要。越来越多的证据表明了笔记模板标准化的益处;然而,文档记录实践中的差异很常见。本研究的主要目的是衡量在一个由九家医院组成的医疗系统中实施的标准化急诊科笔记模板的使用情况和编码性能。
这是一项在实施标准化急诊科笔记模板前后进行的回顾性研究。围绕标准化笔记元素、电子健康记录(EHR)中的医护人员笔记工作流程以及如何纳入新要求的医疗决策元素,建立了多学科小组共识。所测量的主要结果包括使用标准化笔记模板的急诊科就诊比例,以及实施前后6个月内计费代码的分布情况。
在实施前的时期,九家急诊科共使用了六种传统的急诊科笔记模板,使用最多的模板约占急诊科就诊次数的36%。在六种传统模板中,文档元素存在明显差异。实施后,全系统82%的急诊科就诊使用了单一的标准化笔记模板。实施后,我们观察到编码为最高 acuity 的急诊科就诊比例增加了1%,编码为第二高 acuity 的比例没有变化。
鉴于新的2023年编码指南,我们观察到在一个由九家医院组成的医疗系统中,标准化急诊科笔记模板的使用增加了两倍多。标准化笔记模板格式的开发和使用严重依赖多学科利益相关者的参与,以指导适用于电子健康记录中各种文档记录实践的设计。实施标准化笔记模板后,我们观察到编码性能优于预期。