Shah Shreya, Bedgood Michael, Devon-Sand Anna, Dolphin-Dempsey Cathriona, Cherukuri Venkata, Weng Kirsti, Lin Steven, Sharp Christopher
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States.
Coronavirus Science Branch Epidemiology Team, California Department of Health Care Services, Richmond, California, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):771-777. doi: 10.1055/a-2367-8564. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Documentation burden is one of the largest contributors to physician burnout. Evaluation and Management (E&M) coding changes were implemented in 2021 to alleviate documentation burden.
We used this opportunity to develop documentation best practices, implement new electronic health record (EHR) tools, and study the potential impact on provider experiences with documentation related to these 2021 E&M changes, documentation length, and time spent documenting at an academic medical center.
Five actionable best practices, developed through a consensus-driven, multidisciplinary approach in November 2020, led to the creation of two new ambulatory note templates, one for E&M visits (implemented in January 2021) and another for preventative visits (implemented in May 2021). As part of a quality-improvement initiative at nine faculty primary care clinics, surveys were developed utilizing a 5-point Likert scale to assess provider perceptions and deidentified EHR metadata (Signal, Epic Systems) were analyzed to measure changes in EHR use metrics between a pre-E&M changes timeframe (August 2020-December 2020) and a post-E&M change timeframe (August 2021-December 2021). A subgroup analysis was conducted comparing EHR use metrics among note template utilizers versus nonutilizers. Any provider who used one of the note templates at least once was categorized as a utilizer.
Between January 2021 and December 2021, the adoption of the E&M visit template was 31,480 instances among 120 unique ambulatory providers, and adoption of the preventative visit template was 1,464 instances among 22 unique ambulatory providers. Survey response rate among faculty primary care providers was 82% (88/107): 55% (48/88) believed the 2021 E&M changes provided an opportunity to reduce documentation burden, and 28% reported favorable satisfaction with time spent documenting. Among providers who reported using one or both of the new note templates, 81% (35/43) of survey respondents reported favorable satisfaction with new note templates. EHR use metric analyses revealed a small, yet significant reduction in time in notes per appointment ( = 0.004) with no significant change in documentation length of notes ( = 0.45). Note template utilization was associated with a statistically significant reduction in documentation length ( = 0.034).
This study shows modest progress in improving EHR use measures of documentation length and time spent documenting following the 2021 E&M changes, but without great improvement in perceived documentation burden. Additional tools are needed to reduce documentation burden and further research is needed to understand the impact of these interventions.
文档负担是导致医生职业倦怠的最大因素之一。2021年实施了评估与管理(E&M)编码变更,以减轻文档负担。
我们利用这一契机制定文档最佳实践,实施新的电子健康记录(EHR)工具,并研究这些2021年E&M变更对学术医疗中心医生文档记录体验、文档长度以及记录时间的潜在影响。
通过2020年11月由共识驱动的多学科方法制定了五项可操作的最佳实践,从而创建了两个新的门诊记录模板,一个用于E&M就诊(2021年1月实施),另一个用于预防性就诊(2021年5月实施)。作为九家教师初级保健诊所质量改进计划的一部分,使用5点李克特量表进行调查,以评估医生的看法,并分析去识别化的EHR元数据(Signal,Epic Systems),以衡量E&M变更前时间段(2020年8月至2020年12月)和E&M变更后时间段(2021年8月至2021年12月)之间EHR使用指标的变化。进行了亚组分析,比较了记录模板使用者与非使用者之间的EHR使用指标。任何至少使用过一次记录模板的医生都被归类为使用者。
在2021年1月至2021年12月期间,120名独立门诊医生中E&M就诊模板的采用次数为31480次,22名独立门诊医生中预防性就诊模板的采用次数为1464次。教师初级保健医生的调查回复率为82%(88/107):55%(48/88)的人认为2021年E&M变更提供了减轻文档负担的机会,28%的人对记录时间表示满意。在报告使用了一个或两个新记录模板的医生中,81%(35/43)的调查受访者对新记录模板表示满意。EHR使用指标分析显示,每次预约记录时间略有但显著减少(=0.004),记录文档长度无显著变化(=0.45)。记录模板的使用与文档长度的显著减少相关(=0.034)。
本研究表明,在2021年E&M变更后,在改善EHR使用的文档长度和记录时间方面取得了一定进展,但在感知到的文档负担方面没有很大改善。需要额外的工具来减轻文档负担,还需要进一步研究以了解这些干预措施的影响。