Suppr超能文献

有或无牙周累及的牙再植术预后的比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of the Outcome of Intentional Replantation in Teeth with or without Periodontal Involvement: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

J Endod. 2024 Jul;50(7):944-953. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.03.013. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intentional replantation (IR) is considered as a viable treatment option to preserve the teeth with apical periodontitis. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of IR in teeth with or without periodontal involvement, and to investigate the influence of related factors.

METHODS

A total of 157 teeth with a documented history of IR between September 2012 and November 2022 and a follow-up duration of more than 1 year were included. The samples included 100 teeth with simple apical periodontitis and 57 teeth with combined periodontal-endodontic lesions (CPEL). Clinical and radiographic criteria were used to evaluate treatment outcomes including functional retention and extraction. Chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare bivariate associations between outcomes and clinical or demographic variables. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate the cumulative survival rate of the intentionally replanted teeth.

RESULTS

The overall cumulative survival rates were 93.0% at 1 year, 76.7% at 5 years, and 56.2% at 10 years. Among the 100 teeth with simple apical periodontitis, the survival rates were 93.0%, 86.7%, and 78.8% at the same time points. In contrast, 57 teeth with CPEL exhibited survival rates of 93.0%, 65.0%, and 36.9%, respectively. The primary postoperative complications that led to extraction were periodontal involvement (51.9%), tooth fracture (18.5%), external root resorption (18.5%), and persistent apical periodontitis (11.1%). The outcomes of teeth with CPEL were significantly affected by the presence of a sinus tract and crown restoration. In contrast, no significant prognostic factors were identified for teeth without periodontal involvement.

CONCLUSION

The long-term prognosis of teeth with CPEL is significantly worse than those with simple apical periodontitis. The main reason of extraction was periodontal involvement. Regular periodontal maintenance and appropriate crown restoration may help to improve the prognosis for teeth with CPEL.

摘要

目的

有根尖周炎的牙齿,可通过再植术(IR)保留。本研究旨在比较伴或不伴牙周病变的再植术治疗效果,并探讨相关因素的影响。

方法

纳入 2012 年 9 月至 2022 年 11 月间接受再植术且随访时间超过 1 年的 157 颗牙。样本包括单纯根尖周炎 100 颗,牙周-牙髓联合病变 57 颗。采用临床和影像学标准评估治疗效果,包括功能保留和拔牙。采用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切概率法比较治疗效果与临床和人口统计学变量之间的关系。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估再植牙的累积生存率。

结果

总体 1 年、5 年、10 年累积生存率分别为 93.0%、76.7%和 56.2%。单纯根尖周炎组 1 年、5 年、10 年累积生存率分别为 93.0%、86.7%和 78.8%。牙周-牙髓联合病变组则分别为 93.0%、65.0%和 36.9%。导致拔牙的主要术后并发症为牙周病变(51.9%)、牙折(18.5%)、牙根外吸收(18.5%)和持续性根尖周炎(11.1%)。牙周-牙髓联合病变组的预后与窦道和冠修复的存在显著相关。而无牙周病变组无明显预后相关因素。

结论

牙周-牙髓联合病变组的长期预后明显差于单纯根尖周炎组。拔牙的主要原因是牙周病变。定期牙周维护和适当的冠修复可能有助于改善牙周-牙髓联合病变组的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验