Corbella Stefano, Taschieri Silvio, Tsesis Igor, Goldberger Tomer, Francetti Luca, Rosen Eyal
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Aust Endod J. 2025 Apr;51(1):218-229. doi: 10.1111/aej.12923. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques for the preservation of a tooth with VRF. We included case series presenting techniques for the treatment of VRFs. Both electronic sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central) and reference lists/table of contents of pertinent journals were screened. Eight articles (six studies) were included. Four of the studies bonded the fractured fragments with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin, one adopted MTA, and in one study the authors used resin-ionomer cement. There was significant heterogeneity in the results regarding teeth survival rate and it was not possible to perform a quantitative synthesis. Scientific evidence concerning the treatment of vertically fractured roots is sparse and of low quality. Consequently, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of the reported techniques. More studies with higher scientific standards may add validity to the techniques described here. Trial Registration: CRD42024524356 in PROSPERO.
本系统评价的目的是评估保存患有垂直根折(VRF)牙齿的手术技术的疗效。我们纳入了展示治疗VRF技术的病例系列。对电子资源(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane中心)以及相关期刊的参考文献列表/目录进行了筛选。纳入了8篇文章(6项研究)。其中4项研究使用4-META/MMA-TBB树脂粘结骨折碎片,1项采用MTA,1项研究中作者使用了树脂-离子水门汀。关于牙齿存活率的结果存在显著异质性,无法进行定量综合分析。关于垂直根折治疗的科学证据稀少且质量较低。因此,无法就所报道技术的疗效得出结论。更多具有更高科学标准的研究可能会增加此处所述技术的有效性。试验注册:PROSPERO中的CRD42024524356。