Idrissou Yaya, Vall Eric, Blanfort Vincent, Blanchard Mélanie, Alkoiret Traoré Ibrahim, Lecomte Philippe
Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Santé et Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d'Agronomie (FA), Université de Parakou, 01 BP 123, Parakou, Benin.
Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), UMR SELMET, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 25;10(7):e28748. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28748. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
In Benin, adaptation to climate change in the livestock sector has led cattle farmers to develop different livestock practices. Most research has focused on evaluating the effects of these practices on livestock productivity. However, information on the effect of these practices on carbon (C) sequestration in farmland soils is lacking. Soil C sequestration has been identified as a potential strategy to offset greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, the present study aimed at filling this gap. The calculation was one hand based on inventory data obtained from literature sources (excrement production of each cattle category, moisture content of each crop, ratio of crop residue to main product, and C content of the main product and excrement) and on the other hand on activity data (cattle herd size, manure applied, land use area, crop yield, and crop residues management) obtained from surveys carried out among 360 cattle farmers belonging to 3 cattle farming types. The results revealed that whatever the cattle farming type, annual C input from manure was higher (p˂0.05) than C input from crop residues. Annual C sequestration in farmland soil of farms integrating livestock with cereal-legume and forage crops was significantly higher (Type 2: 158.07 ± 1.79 kg C ha year) followed by farms integrating livestock with cereal-legume crops (Type 1: 99.51 ± 0.95 kg C ha year), which in turn had a higher value than farms practicing pastoral mobility (Type 3: 78.46 ± 0.70 kg C ha year). These results highlight the potential for climate change mitigation through these farming practices. This is justified because the quantity of C sequestered in farmland soil of all cattle farming types was significant. Thus, for future research, it is necessary to include soil C sequestration in the calculations of farms' carbon footprint.
在贝宁,畜牧业适应气候变化促使养牛户采用了不同的畜牧方式。大多数研究都集中在评估这些方式对牲畜生产力的影响。然而,关于这些方式对农田土壤碳固存的影响的信息却很缺乏。土壤碳固存已被确定为抵消温室气体排放的一种潜在策略。因此,本研究旨在填补这一空白。计算一方面基于从文献来源获得的清单数据(各类牛的粪便产量、每种作物的含水量、作物残茬与主要产品的比例以及主要产品和粪便的碳含量),另一方面基于从对属于三种养殖类型的360名养牛户进行的调查中获得的活动数据(牛群规模、施用的粪便、土地使用面积、作物产量和作物残茬管理)。结果表明,无论养殖类型如何,粪便的年度碳输入量均高于(p˂0.05)作物残茬的碳输入量。将畜牧业与谷物 - 豆类和饲料作物相结合的农场的农田土壤年度碳固存量显著更高(类型2:158.07 ± 1.79千克碳/公顷·年),其次是将畜牧业与谷物 - 豆类作物相结合的农场(类型1:99.51 ± 0.95千克碳/公顷·年),其碳固存量又高于实行游牧的农场(类型3:78.46 ± 0.70千克碳/公顷·年)。这些结果凸显了通过这些养殖方式缓解气候变化的潜力。这是合理的,因为所有养殖类型的农田土壤中固存的碳量都很可观。因此,对于未来的研究,有必要将土壤碳固存纳入农场碳足迹的计算中。