School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Oct;19(7):2708-2725. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2338125. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Eye-gaze technology offers professionals a range of feedback tools, but it is not well understood how these are used to support decision-making or how professionals understand their purpose and function. This paper explores how professionals use a variety of feedback tools and provides commentary on their current use and ideas for future tool development. The study adopted a focus group methodology with two groups of professional participants: those involved in the assessment and provision of eye-gaze technology ( = 6) and those who interact with individuals using eye-gaze technology on an ongoing basis ( = 5). Template analysis was used to provide qualitative insight into the research questions. Professionals highlighted several issues with existing tools and gave suggestions on how these could be made better. It is generally felt that existing tools highlight the existence of problems but offer little in the way of solutions or suggestions. Some differences of opinion related to professional perspective were highlighted. Questions about automating certain processes were raised by both groups. Discussion highlighted the need for different levels of feedback for users and professionals. Professionals agreed that current tools are useful to identify problems but do not offer insight into potential solutions. Some tools are being used to draw inferences about vision and cognition which are not supported by existing literature. New tools may be needed to better meet the needs of professionals and an increased understanding of how existing tools function may support such development.
眼动追踪技术为专业人员提供了一系列反馈工具,但人们并不清楚这些工具如何用于支持决策,也不了解专业人员对这些工具的目的和功能的理解。本文探讨了专业人员如何使用各种反馈工具,并对其当前用途和未来工具开发的思路进行了评论。该研究采用了焦点小组方法,有两组专业参与者:一组是参与眼动追踪技术评估和提供的人员(=6),另一组是与持续使用眼动追踪技术的个人互动的人员(=5)。模板分析为研究问题提供了定性的深入了解。专业人员强调了现有工具存在的一些问题,并就如何改进这些工具提出了建议。总的来说,现有的工具突出了问题的存在,但在解决方案或建议方面几乎没有提供什么帮助。一些与专业观点相关的意见分歧被强调出来。这两组人员都提出了关于自动化某些流程的问题。讨论强调了为用户和专业人员提供不同层次反馈的必要性。专业人员一致认为,当前的工具有助于发现问题,但不能提供潜在解决方案的见解。一些工具被用于推断视觉和认知,而这并没有得到现有文献的支持。可能需要新的工具来更好地满足专业人员的需求,并且对现有工具功能的深入了解可能支持这种开发。