Griffiths Tom, Clarke Michael T, Swettenham John
School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 04132, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2326. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072326.
: Gaze behaviours, such as fixation on single objects, and switching gaze between two objects are important for signaling messages, making choices or controlling a computer for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and similar movement disabilities. Observing these behaviours can be challenging for clinicians, with a lack of agreement on how they can be objectively quantified or rated. : This study compares two methods of eliciting and observing gaze behaviours: a computer presentation using an eye tracker and an object presentation scored by two independent observers in order to explore the utility of each to clinicians working in this area. Children with CP ( = 39) attempted single-target fixation (STF) and target-target fixation shift (TTFS) tasks using both presentations and the results were compared. : Six children were unable to calibrate the eye tracker to the accuracy level required. Significantly higher scores for both STF (81.3% object presentation and 30.3% computer presentation, < 0.01) and TTFS (70.1% and 26.9%, < 0.01) were seen on the object presentation, with children's performance not predicted by developmental age, severity of CP or presence or absence of strabismus. It is not possible to definitively state which method gives the "correct" result; however, the difference in reported success rate merits further discussion. : Whilst eye tracking may present an "entry barrier" for some children in terms of its accuracy and calibration requirements, object presentation carries with it the risk of over-interpreting children as having fixated. Conversely, eye tracking may be better at recording fixations in children with strabismus, where object-based paradigms may offer more flexible administration for clinicians. The variability in children's performance on both presentations underlines the risk of assuming these skills to be present and the importance of assessing gaze behaviours in individual children.
注视行为,如对单个物体的注视以及在两个物体之间切换注视,对于患有脑瘫(CP)及类似运动障碍的儿童传递信息、做出选择或控制计算机而言非常重要。对于临床医生来说,观察这些行为具有挑战性,因为对于如何客观地量化或评级这些行为缺乏共识。 :本研究比较了两种引出和观察注视行为的方法:一种是使用眼动仪的计算机呈现方式,另一种是由两名独立观察者评分的物体呈现方式,以探讨每种方法对该领域临床医生的实用性。39名患有CP的儿童使用这两种呈现方式尝试了单目标注视(STF)和目标 - 目标注视转移(TTFS)任务,并比较了结果。 :六名儿童无法将眼动仪校准到所需的精度水平。在物体呈现方式下,STF(物体呈现方式得分为81.3%,计算机呈现方式得分为30.3%,P<0.01)和TTFS(分别为70.1%和26.9%,P<0.01)的得分均显著更高,儿童的表现不受发育年龄、CP严重程度或斜视的有无影响。无法明确指出哪种方法给出了“正确”结果;然而,报告的成功率差异值得进一步讨论。 :虽然眼动追踪在准确性和校准要求方面可能对一些儿童构成“进入障碍”,但物体呈现方式存在过度解读儿童注视情况的风险。相反,眼动追踪可能更擅长记录斜视儿童的注视情况,而基于物体的范式可能为临床医生提供更灵活的操作方式。两种呈现方式下儿童表现的变异性凸显了假设这些技能存在的风险以及评估个体儿童注视行为的重要性。