Tricot G, Vlietinck R, Boogaerts M A, Hendrickx B, De Wolf-Peeters C, Van den Berghe H, Verwilghen R L
Br J Haematol. 1985 May;60(1):19-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1985.tb07381.x.
An analysis of clinical, haematological, histological and cytogenetic data was performed in 85 consecutive patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The criteria for diagnosis of refractory anaemia (RA), acquired idiopathic sideroblastic anaemia (AISA) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) were clearly defined, since the inclusion criteria provided by the FAB co-operative group are imprecise. None of these patients has received chemotherapy during the follow-up period. The median survival of the whole group was only 15 months, with less than 10% of the patients surviving after 5 years. Fifteen patients (17.6%) were still alive at time of analysis, 31 (36.5%) have developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and only one of them is still alive; 30 (35.3%) died of infectious and/or haemorrhagic complications. Patients who developed AML had a shorter survival (median survival time 9.5 versus 15 months) but this difference was not significant (P = 0.10). Factors with prognostic value are in order of significance: abnormal localized immature myeloid precursors (= ALIP) in the trephine biopsy, circulating myeloblasts, excess of blasts in the bone marrow smears, age, FAB classification and granulocyte count. In comparison to refractory anaemia with excess of blasts (RAEB), CMML and RAEB in transformation (RAEBt), patients with RA and AISA had a lower incidence of evolution to AML (11% versus 56%), but a higher mortality rate from infections and/or bleeding (59.2% versus 29%). ALIP negative cases were only found among patients with RA and AISA, whereas ALIP positivity was observed in all cases of RAEB and RAEBt, in 10/11 patients with CMML and in almost half the cases of RA and AISA. In RA and AISA patients survival was significantly different between ALIP positive and ALIP negative cases (P = 0.009). Among MDS patients, ALIP negative cases developed significantly less AML than ALIP positive cases (5% versus 44%), but a similar percentage of mortality from infectious and/or haemorrhagic complications was seen in both groups (33% versus 36.5%). Chromosomal analysis proved to be of no significant prognostic value, although a trend for shorter survival was observed in patients with complex karyotype anomalies or without mitoses. Because of their prolonged survival, antileukaemic chemotherapy is contra-indicated in ALIP negative patients (median survival 50 months). Nevertheless they only constitute a minor subgroup of MDS cases. Prognosis in ALIP positive patients is poor (median survival 12.5 months); in these patients therapeutic trials with cytostatic drugs or with inducers of differentiation of myeloid precursor cells seem to be justified.
对85例连续性骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的临床、血液学、组织学和细胞遗传学数据进行了分析。由于FAB协作组提供的纳入标准不精确,因此对难治性贫血(RA)、获得性特发性铁粒幼细胞贫血(AISA)和慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)的诊断标准进行了明确界定。在随访期间,这些患者均未接受化疗。整个组的中位生存期仅为15个月,5年后存活的患者不到10%。分析时15例患者(17.6%)仍存活,31例(36.5%)已发展为急性髓系白血病(AML),其中仅1例仍存活;30例(35.3%)死于感染和/或出血并发症。发展为AML的患者生存期较短(中位生存时间9.5个月对15个月),但这种差异不显著(P = 0.10)。具有预后价值的因素按重要性顺序排列为:骨髓活检中异常局限性未成熟髓系前体细胞(=ALIP)、循环原始粒细胞、骨髓涂片中原粒细胞过多、年龄、FAB分类和粒细胞计数。与伴有过多原始细胞的难治性贫血(RAEB)、CMML和转化中的RAEB(RAEBt)相比,RA和AISA患者发展为AML的发生率较低(11%对56%),但感染和/或出血导致的死亡率较高(59.2%对29%)。仅在RA和AISA患者中发现ALIP阴性病例,而在所有RAEB和RAEBt病例、11例CMML患者中的10例以及几乎一半的RA和AISA病例中观察到ALIP阳性。在RA和AISA患者中,ALIP阳性和阴性病例的生存期有显著差异(P = 0.009)。在MDS患者中,ALIP阴性病例发展为AML的比例明显低于ALIP阳性病例(5%对44%),但两组感染和/或出血并发症导致的死亡率相似(33%对36.5%)。染色体分析被证明没有显著的预后价值,尽管在具有复杂核型异常或无有丝分裂的患者中观察到生存期较短的趋势。由于生存期延长,抗白血病化疗在ALIP阴性患者中是禁忌的(中位生存期50个月)。然而,他们仅构成MDS病例中的一个小亚组。ALIP阳性患者的预后较差(中位生存期为12.5个月);在这些患者中,使用细胞毒性药物或髓系前体细胞分化诱导剂进行治疗试验似乎是合理的。