Suppr超能文献

照护目标记录是否反映了对话内容?评估对话与记录的准确性。

Do goals of care documentation reflect the conversation?: Evaluating conversation-documentation accuracy.

作者信息

Ma Jessica E, Schlichte Lindsay, Haverfield Marie, Gambino Julia, Lange Allison, Blanchard Kelly, Morgan Brianne, Bekelman David B

机构信息

Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2500-2507. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18913. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Documenting goals of care in the electronic health record is meant to relay patient preferences to other clinicians. Evaluating the content and documentation of nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations can inform future goals of care initiative efforts.

METHODS

As part of the ADvancing symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment trial, this study analyzed goals of care conversations led by nurses and social workers and documented in the electronic health record. Informed by a goals of care communication guide, we identified five goals of care components: illness understanding, goals and values, end of life planning, surrogate, and advance directives. Forty conversation transcripts underwent content analysis. Through an iterative team process, we defined documentation accuracy as four categories: (1) Complete-comprehensive accurate documentation of the conversation, (2) Incomplete-partial documentation of the conversation, (3) Missing-discussed and not documented, and (4) Incorrect-misrepresented in documentation. We also defined-Not Discussed-for communication guide questions that were not discussed nor documented. A constant comparative approach was used to determine the presence or absence of conversation content in the documentation.

RESULTS

All five goals of care components were discussed in 67% (27/40) of conversation transcripts. Compared to the transcripts, surrogate (37/40, 93%) and advance directives (36/40, 90%) were often documented completely. Almost 40% of goals and values (15/40, 38%) and half of end of life planning (19/40, 48%) were incomplete. Illness understanding was missing (13/40, 33%), not discussed (13/40, 33%), or incorrect (2/40, 5%).

CONCLUSION

Nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations discussed and documented most components of the goals of care communication guide. Further research may guide how best to determine the relative importance of accuracy, especially in the broad setting of incomplete, missing, and incorrect EHR documentation.

摘要

背景

在电子健康记录中记录护理目标旨在将患者偏好传达给其他临床医生。评估护士和社会工作者主导的护理目标对话的内容和记录情况可为未来的护理目标倡议工作提供信息。

方法

作为“推进姑息治疗缓解症状”试验的一部分,本研究分析了由护士和社会工作者主导并记录在电子健康记录中的护理目标对话。依据护理目标沟通指南,我们确定了护理目标的五个组成部分:疾病理解、目标与价值观、临终规划、替代决策者和预先指示。对40份对话记录进行了内容分析。通过团队反复讨论,我们将记录准确性定义为四类:(1)完整——对话的全面准确记录;(2)不完整——对话的部分记录;(3)缺失——讨论了但未记录;(4)错误——记录中存在错误表述。我们还定义了“未讨论”——针对沟通指南中未讨论也未记录的问题。采用持续比较法来确定记录中是否存在对话内容。

结果

67%(27/40)的对话记录讨论了所有五个护理目标组成部分。与记录相比,替代决策者(37/40,93%)和预先指示(36/40,90%)的记录通常较为完整。近40%的目标与价值观(15/40,38%)和一半的临终规划(19/40,48%)记录不完整。疾病理解部分缺失(13/40,33%)、未讨论(13/40,33%)或记录错误(2/40,5%)。

结论

护士和社会工作者主导的护理目标对话讨论并记录了护理目标沟通指南的大部分组成部分。进一步的研究可能会指导如何最好地确定准确性的相对重要性,尤其是在电子健康记录不完整、缺失和错误记录的广泛背景下。

相似文献

5
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
9
How Do Clinicians Use Quotations in Goals of Care Notes?临床医生如何在照护目标记录中使用引文?
Chest. 2025 Jun;167(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
10
Advance care planning for haemodialysis patients.血液透析患者的预先护理计划
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 26;7(7):CD010737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010737.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
The care planning umbrella: The evolution of advance care planning.护理计划总览:预先护理计划的演变
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2350-2356. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18287. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
8
Goals of Care Documentation: Insights from A Pilot Implementation Study.照护目标记录:一项试点实施研究的见解
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr;63(4):485-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验