Trouwborst Inez, Jardon Kelly M, Gijbels Anouk, Hul Gabby, Feskens Edith J M, Afman Lydia A, Linge Jennifer, Goossens Gijs H, Blaak Ellen E
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
TI Food and Nutrition (TiFN), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2024 Apr 9;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12986-024-00795-y.
Body composition and body fat distribution are important predictors of cardiometabolic diseases. The etiology of cardiometabolic diseases is heterogenous, and partly driven by inter-individual differences in tissue-specific insulin sensitivity.
To investigate (1) the associations between body composition and whole-body, liver and muscle insulin sensitivity, and (2) changes in body composition and insulin sensitivity and their relationship after a 12-week isocaloric diet high in mono-unsaturated fatty acids (HMUFA) or a low-fat, high-protein, high-fiber (LFHP) diet.
This subcohort analysis of the PERSON study includes 93 individuals (53% women, BMI 25-40 kg/m2, 40-75 years) who participated in this randomized intervention study. At baseline and after 12 weeks of following the LFHP, or HMUFA diet, we performed a 7-point oral glucose tolerance test to assess whole-body, liver, and muscle insulin sensitivity, and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging to determine body composition and body fat distribution. Both diets are within the guidelines of healthy nutrition.
At baseline, liver fat content was associated with worse liver insulin sensitivity (β [95%CI]; 0.12 [0.01; 0.22]). Only in women, thigh muscle fat content was inversely related to muscle insulin sensitivity (-0.27 [-0.48; -0.05]). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was inversely associated with whole-body, liver, and muscle insulin sensitivity. Both diets decreased VAT, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (aSAT), and liver fat, but not whole-body and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity with no differences between diets. Waist circumference, however, decreased more following the LFHP diet as compared to the HMUFA diet (-3.0 vs. -0.5 cm, respectively). After the LFHP but not HMUFA diet, improvements in body composition were positively associated with improvements in whole-body and liver insulin sensitivity.
Liver and muscle insulin sensitivity are distinctly associated with liver and muscle fat accumulation. Although both LFHP and HMUFA diets improved in body fat, VAT, aSAT, and liver fat, only LFHP-induced improvements in body composition are associated with improved insulin sensitivity.
NCT03708419 (clinicaltrials.gov).
身体组成和体脂分布是心脏代谢疾病的重要预测指标。心脏代谢疾病的病因具有异质性,部分由组织特异性胰岛素敏感性的个体差异驱动。
研究(1)身体组成与全身、肝脏和肌肉胰岛素敏感性之间的关联,以及(2)在为期12周的高单不饱和脂肪酸等热量饮食(HMUFA)或低脂、高蛋白、高纤维(LFHP)饮食后身体组成和胰岛素敏感性的变化及其关系。
对PERSON研究的该亚组分析纳入了93名个体(53%为女性,BMI 25 - 40kg/m²,年龄40 - 75岁),他们参与了这项随机干预研究。在基线以及遵循LFHP或HMUFA饮食12周后,我们进行了7点口服葡萄糖耐量试验以评估全身、肝脏和肌肉胰岛素敏感性,并进行了全身磁共振成像以确定身体组成和体脂分布。两种饮食均符合健康营养指南。
在基线时,肝脏脂肪含量与较差的肝脏胰岛素敏感性相关(β[95%CI];0.12[0.01;0.22])。仅在女性中,大腿肌肉脂肪含量与肌肉胰岛素敏感性呈负相关(-0.27[-0.48;-0.05])。内脏脂肪组织(VAT)与全身、肝脏和肌肉胰岛素敏感性呈负相关。两种饮食均降低了VAT、腹部皮下脂肪组织(aSAT)和肝脏脂肪,但未改变全身和组织特异性胰岛素敏感性,且两种饮食之间无差异。然而,与HMUFA饮食相比,LFHP饮食后腰围下降更多(分别为-3.0 vs. -0.5cm)。在LFHP饮食而非HMUFA饮食后,身体组成的改善与全身和肝脏胰岛素敏感性的改善呈正相关。
肝脏和肌肉胰岛素敏感性分别与肝脏和肌肉脂肪堆积相关。尽管LFHP和HMUFA饮食均改善了体脂、VAT、aSAT和肝脏脂肪,但只有LFHP饮食引起的身体组成改善与胰岛素敏感性改善相关。
NCT03708419(clinicaltrials.gov)。