Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel (Y.G., H.Z., L.T., A.Y.M., G.T., N.C., N.B., M.R., D.S., S.K., O.K., R.G., H.A.-H., A.B., E.S., A.R., I.S.).
Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel (I.S., D.S., G.T., Y.C., Y.H.).
Circulation. 2018 Mar 13;137(11):1143-1157. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030501. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
We aimed to assess whether distinct lifestyle strategies can differentially affect specific body adipose depots.
We performed an 18-month randomized controlled trial among 278 sedentary adults with abdominal obesity (75%) or dyslipidemia in an isolated workplace with a monitored provided lunch. Participants were randomized to isocaloric low-fat or Mediterranean/low-carbohydrate (MED/LC) diet+28 g walnuts/day with/without added moderate physical activity (PA; 80% aerobic; supervised/free gym membership). Overall primary outcome was body fat redistribution, and the main specific end point was visceral adipose tissue (VAT). We further followed the dynamics of different fat depots (deep and superficial subcutaneous, liver, pericardial, muscle, pancreas, and renal sinus) by magnetic resonance imaging.
Of 278 participants (age, 48 years, 89% men, body mass index, 30.8 kg/m), 86% completed the trial with good adherence. The low-fat group preferentially decreased reported fat intake (-21.0% versus -11.5% for the MED/LC; <0.001), and the MED/LC group decreased reported carbohydrates intake (-39.5% versus -21.3% for the low-fat group; <0.001). The PA groups significantly increased the metabolic equivalents per week versus the PA groups (19.0 versus 2.1; =0.009). Whereas final moderate weight loss was indifferent, exercise attenuated the waist circumference rebound with the greatest effect in the MED/LC group (<0.05). VAT (-22%), intrahepatic (-29%), and intrapericardial (-11%) fats declines were higher than pancreatic and femur intermuscular fats (1% to 2%) loss. Independent of weight loss, PA with either diet had a significantly greater effect on decreasing VAT (mean of difference, -6.67cm; 95% confidence interval, -14.8 to -0.45) compared with PA. The MED/LC diet was superior to the low-fat diet in decreasing intrahepatic, intrapericardial, and pancreatic fats (<0.05 for all). In contrast, renal sinus and femoral intermuscular fats were not differentially altered by lifestyle interventions but by weight loss per se. In multivariate models further adjusted for weight loss, losing VAT or intrahepatic fat was independently associated with improved lipid profile, losing deep subcutaneous adipose tissue with improved insulin sensitivity, and losing superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue remained neutral except for an association with decreased leptin.
Moderate weight loss alone inadequately reflects the significant lifestyle effects on atherogenic and diabetogenic fat depots. The MED/LC diet mobilizes specific ectopic fat depots, and exercise has an independent contribution to VAT loss. Fat depots exhibit diverse responsiveness and are differentially related to cardiometabolic markers. Distinct lifestyle protocols may uniquely induce fat mobilization from specific anatomic sites.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01530724.
我们旨在评估不同的生活方式策略是否会对特定的身体脂肪沉积产生不同的影响。
我们在一个孤立的工作场所进行了一项为期 18 个月的随机对照试验,该工作场所中有 278 名久坐的腹部肥胖(75%)或血脂异常的成年人,这些成年人的午餐由监控提供。参与者被随机分配到等热量低脂或地中海/低碳水化合物(MED/LC)饮食+每天 28 克核桃+或不+适量的体力活动(80%为有氧运动;监督/免费健身房会员)。总体主要结局是体脂再分布,主要的具体终点是内脏脂肪组织(VAT)。我们进一步通过磁共振成像跟踪不同脂肪沉积(深部和浅部皮下、肝脏、心包、肌肉、胰腺和肾窦)的动态。
在 278 名参与者(年龄 48 岁,89%为男性,体重指数 30.8kg/m2)中,86%的人完成了试验,且依从性良好。低脂组优先减少报告的脂肪摄入量(与 MED/LC 组相比,减少 21.0%对 11.5%;<0.001),而 MED/LC 组减少报告的碳水化合物摄入量(与低脂组相比,减少 39.5%对 21.3%;<0.001)。与 PA 组相比,PA 组每周的代谢当量显著增加(19.0 对 2.1;=0.009)。尽管最终体重适度减轻,但运动减轻了腰围反弹,MED/LC 组的效果最大(<0.05)。VAT(-22%)、肝内脂肪(-29%)和心包内脂肪(-11%)的下降高于胰腺和股骨间肌肉脂肪(1%至 2%)的下降。独立于体重减轻,无论饮食如何,PA 都能显著降低 VAT(平均差值,-6.67cm;95%置信区间,-14.8 至-0.45),而 PA 的效果更大。与低脂饮食相比,MED/LC 饮食更能降低肝内、心包内和胰腺脂肪(<0.05)。相比之下,生活方式干预对肾窦和股骨间肌肉脂肪没有差异,但体重减轻本身有影响。在进一步调整体重减轻的多变量模型中,VAT 或肝内脂肪的丢失与血脂谱的改善独立相关,深部皮下脂肪的丢失与胰岛素敏感性的改善相关,而浅部皮下脂肪的丢失则保持中性,除了与瘦素降低有关外。
单独适度减轻体重不能充分反映生活方式对动脉粥样硬化和糖尿病性脂肪沉积的显著影响。MED/LC 饮食动员特定的异位脂肪沉积,运动对 VAT 损失有独立贡献。脂肪沉积表现出不同的反应性,与心脏代谢标志物的关系也不同。不同的生活方式方案可能会从特定的解剖部位独特地诱导脂肪动员。