Ravuri Preetham, Kubavat Ajay K, Rathi Vipul, Luke John T, Varma Praveen K, Mujoo Sheetal, Somaraj Vinej
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, VYWS Dental College and Hospital, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S93-S96. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_883_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
This systematic review examines the efficacy and biocompatibility of orthodontic clear aligner tooth aligners constructed from polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PeT-G), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs), and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA).
To find relevant papers published through September 2021, PubMed was searched extensively. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the effectiveness and biocompatibility of the aligner materials were included. Data were extracted independently, and the quality of included research was appraised using relevant procedures. The research variability necessitated a narrative synthesis.
Five studies were included for comparison. All materials were biocompatible; however, PeT-G and EVA aligners caused the least tissue irritation. Patients preferred TPU aligners for initial comfort and PeT-G aligners for transparency and endurance.
Biocompatible PeT-G, PP, PC, TPU, and EVA tooth aligners fix malocclusions. Aligner materials should be chosen based on patient preferences, treatment goals, and material qualities. For stronger proof, a longer-term study is needed.
本系统评价研究了由聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯二醇(PeT-G)、聚丙烯(PP)、聚碳酸酯(PC)、热塑性聚氨酯(TPU)和乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)制成的正畸透明矫治器的疗效和生物相容性。
为查找截至2021年9月发表的相关论文,对PubMed进行了广泛检索。纳入评估矫治器材料有效性和生物相容性的随机临床试验(RCT)和观察性研究。独立提取数据,并使用相关程序评估纳入研究的质量。由于研究变异性,需要进行叙述性综合分析。
纳入五项研究进行比较。所有材料均具有生物相容性;然而,PeT-G和EVA矫治器引起的组织刺激最小。患者因初始舒适度而更喜欢TPU矫治器,因透明度和耐用性而更喜欢PeT-G矫治器。
具有生物相容性的PeT-G、PP、PC、TPU和EVA牙齿矫治器可矫正错牙合畸形。应根据患者偏好、治疗目标和材料特性选择矫治器材料。为了获得更有力的证据,需要进行长期研究。