Hotca Alexandra, Sindhu Kunal K, Lehrer Eric J, Hartsell William F, Vargas Carlos, Tsai Henry K, Chang John H, Apisarnthanarax Smith, Nichols Romaine C, Chhabra Arpit M, Hasan Shaakir, Press Robert H, Lazarev Stanislav, Hajj Carla, Kabarriti Rafi, Rule William G, Simone Charles B, Choi J Isabelle
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
New York Proton Center, New York, New York.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;9(5):101459. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101459. eCollection 2024 May.
Treatment options for recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) previously treated with radiation therapy (RT) are limited. Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) can offer lower toxicities by limiting doses to surrounding tissues. In this study, we present the first multi-institutional series reporting on toxicities and outcomes after reRT for locoregionally recurrent EC with PBT.
Analysis of the prospective, multicenter, Proton Collaborative Group registry of patients with recurrent EC who had previously received photon-based RT and underwent PBT reRT was performed. Patient/tumor characteristics, treatment details, outcomes, and toxicities were collected. Local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Event time was determined from reRT start.
Between 2012 and 2020, 31 patients received reRT via uniform scanning/passive scattering (61.3%) or pencil beam scanning (38.7%) PBT at 7 institutions. Median prior RT, PBT reRT, and cumulative doses were 50.4 Gy (range, 37.5-110.4), 48.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (25.2-72.1), and 99.9 Gy (79.1-182.5), respectively. Of these patients, 12.9% had 2 prior RT courses, and 67.7% received PBT with concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 7.2 months (0.9-64.7). Post-PBT, there were 16.7% locoregional only, 11.1% distant only, and 16.7% locoregional and distant recurrences. Six-month LC, DMFS, and OS were 80.5%, 83.4%, and 69.1%, respectively. One-year LC, DMFS, and OS were 67.1%, 83.4%, and 27%, respectively. Acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 23% of patients, with 1 acute grade 5 toxicity secondary to esophageal hemorrhage, unclear if related to reRT or disease progression. No grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported.
In the largest report to date of PBT for reRT in patients with recurrent EC, we observed acceptable acute toxicities and encouraging rates of disease control. However, these findings are limited by the poor prognoses of these patients, who are at high risk of mortality. Further research is needed to better assess the long-term benefits and toxicities of PBT in this specific patient population.
既往接受过放射治疗(RT)的复发性食管癌(EC)的治疗选择有限。质子束治疗(PBT)再程放疗(reRT)可通过限制对周围组织的剂量来降低毒性。在本研究中,我们首次报告了多机构系列研究中,PBT对局部区域复发性EC进行再程放疗后的毒性和结局。
对前瞻性、多中心质子协作组登记的复发性EC患者进行分析,这些患者既往接受过基于光子的RT并接受了PBT再程放疗。收集患者/肿瘤特征、治疗细节、结局和毒性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计局部控制(LC)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和总生存期(OS)。事件时间从再程放疗开始时确定。
2012年至2020年期间,31例患者在7家机构通过均匀扫描/被动散射(61.3%)或笔形束扫描(38.7%)PBT接受了再程放疗。既往RT、PBT再程放疗和累积剂量的中位数分别为50.4 Gy(范围37.5 - 110.4)、48.6 Gy(相对生物效应)(25.2 - 72.1)和99.9 Gy(79.1 - 182.5)。这些患者中,12.9%既往接受过2次RT疗程,67.7%接受PBT时联合化疗。中位随访时间为7.2个月(0.9 - 64.7)。PBT后,仅局部区域复发占16.7%,仅远处复发占11.1%,局部区域和远处复发均占16.7%。6个月时的LC、DMFS和OS分别为80.5%、83.4%和69.1%。1年时的LC、DMFS和OS分别为67.1%、83.4%和27%。23%的患者发生急性≥3级毒性,1例急性5级毒性继发于食管出血,不清楚是否与再程放疗或疾病进展有关。未报告≥3级晚期毒性。
在迄今为止关于复发性EC患者PBT再程放疗的最大规模报告中,我们观察到可接受的急性毒性和令人鼓舞的疾病控制率。然而,这些结果受到这些患者预后不良、死亡风险高的限制。需要进一步研究以更好地评估PBT在这一特定患者群体中的长期益处和毒性。