• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二十年来,瑞典全国队列中胃造口术放置的时间趋势和结果。

Time trends and outcomes of gastrostomy placement in a Swedish national cohort over two decades.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75185, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 14;30(10):1358-1367. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1358.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1358
PMID:38596497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11000080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and laparoscopically inserted gastrostomy have become the gold standard for adult patients and children, respectively, requiring long-term enteral nutrition support. Procedure-related mortality is a rare event, often reported to be zero in smaller studies. National data on 30-d mortality and long-term survival rates after gastrostomy placement are scarce in the literature.

AIM

To study the use of gastrostomies in Sweden from 1998-2019 and to analyze procedure-related mortality and short-term (< 30 d) and long-term survival.

METHODS

In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, individuals that had received a gastrostomy between 1998-2019 in Sweden were included. Individuals were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register, and survival analysis was possible by cross-referencing the Swedish Death Register. The cohort was divided into three age groups: Children (0-18 years); adults (19-64 years); and elderly (≥ 65 years). Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox regression were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

In total 48682 individuals (52% males, average age 60.9 ± 25.3 years) were identified. The cohort consisted of 12.0% children, 29.5% adults, and 58.5% elderly. An increased use of gastrostomies was observed during the study period, from 13.7/100000 to 22.3/100000 individuals ( < 0.001). The use of PEG more than doubled (about 800 to 1800/year), with a corresponding decrease in open gastrostomy (about 700 to 340/year). Laparoscopic gastrostomy increased more than ten-fold (about 20 to 240/year). Overall, PEG, open gastrostomy, and laparoscopic gastrostomy constituted 70.0% ( = 34060), 23.3% ( = 11336), and 4.9% ( = 2404), respectively. Procedure-related mortality was 0.1% ( = 44) overall (PEG: 0.05%, open: 0.24%, laparoscopic: 0.04%). The overall 30-d mortality rate was 10.0% (PEG: 9.8%, open: 12.4%, laparoscopic: 1.7%) and decreased from 11.6% in 1998-2009 8.5% in 2010-2019 ( < 0.001). One-year and ten-year survival rates for children, adults, and elderly were 93.7%, 67.5%, and 42.1% and 79.9%, 39.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. The most common causes of death were malignancies and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

CONCLUSION

The annual use of gastrostomies in Sweden increased during the study period, with a shift towards more minimally invasive procedures. Although procedure-related death was rare, the overall 30-d mortality rate was high (10%). To overcome this, we believe that patient selection should be improved.

摘要

背景

经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)和腹腔镜下胃造口术分别已成为成人患者和儿童患者长期肠内营养支持的金标准。与该操作相关的死亡率是一种罕见的事件,在较小的研究中通常报告为零。关于接受胃造口术患者的 30 天死亡率和长期生存率的全国性数据在文献中很少见。

目的

研究瑞典从 1998 年至 2019 年期间胃造口术的使用情况,并分析与操作相关的死亡率以及短期(<30 天)和长期生存率。

方法

在这项回顾性、基于人群的队列研究中,纳入了 1998 年至 2019 年期间在瑞典接受胃造口术的个体。通过瑞典国家患者登记处确定个体,并通过交叉参考瑞典死亡登记处进行生存分析。该队列分为三个年龄组:儿童(0-18 岁);成年人(19-64 岁);和老年人(≥65 岁)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 对数秩检验和 Cox 回归进行生存分析。

结果

共确定了 48682 名个体(52%为男性,平均年龄为 60.9±25.3 岁)。该队列包括 12.0%的儿童、29.5%的成年人和 58.5%的老年人。在研究期间,胃造口术的使用呈增加趋势,从 13.7/100000 增加到 22.3/100000 个人(<0.001)。PEG 的使用增加了一倍以上(约 800 到 1800/年),而开放性胃造口术的使用则相应减少(约 700 到 340/年)。腹腔镜胃造口术增加了十倍以上(约 20 到 240/年)。总体而言,PEG、开放性胃造口术和腹腔镜胃造口术分别占 70.0%(=34060)、23.3%(=11336)和 4.9%(=2404)。与操作相关的死亡率总体为 0.1%(=44)(PEG:0.05%,开放性:0.24%,腹腔镜:0.04%)。总体 30 天死亡率为 10.0%(PEG:9.8%,开放性:12.4%,腹腔镜:1.7%),从 1998-2009 年的 11.6%下降到 2010-2019 年的 8.5%(<0.001)。儿童、成年人和老年人的一年和十年生存率分别为 93.7%、67.5%和 42.1%和 79.9%、39.2%和 6.8%。死亡的最常见原因是恶性肿瘤以及心血管和呼吸系统疾病。

结论

在研究期间,瑞典胃造口术的年使用率增加,微创手术的使用率也有所增加。尽管与操作相关的死亡率较低,但总体 30 天死亡率仍很高(10%)。为了克服这一问题,我们认为应改善患者选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/86fb4187b8ef/WJG-30-1358-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/3340065cfa67/WJG-30-1358-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/addd782ce4c3/WJG-30-1358-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/b7d1894e67d6/WJG-30-1358-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/62046e772bee/WJG-30-1358-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/655ac74f387f/WJG-30-1358-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/86fb4187b8ef/WJG-30-1358-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/3340065cfa67/WJG-30-1358-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/addd782ce4c3/WJG-30-1358-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/b7d1894e67d6/WJG-30-1358-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/62046e772bee/WJG-30-1358-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/655ac74f387f/WJG-30-1358-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4876/11000080/86fb4187b8ef/WJG-30-1358-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Time trends and outcomes of gastrostomy placement in a Swedish national cohort over two decades.二十年来,瑞典全国队列中胃造口术放置的时间趋势和结果。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 14;30(10):1358-1367. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1358.
2
New laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy. Description and comparison with others gastrostomy types.新型腹腔镜辅助经皮胃造口术。描述及其与其他类型胃造口术的比较。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016 Dec;16:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
3
Prospective determination of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complication rates in children: still a safe procedure.前瞻性确定儿童经皮内镜胃造口术并发症发生率:仍然是一种安全的操作。
Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):714-9; discussion 719-21. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
4
The role of surgical gastrostomy in the age of endoscopic gastrostomy: a 13 years and 543 patients retrospective study.外科胃造口术在内镜下胃造口术时代的作用:一项涉及13年543例患者的回顾性研究。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016 Dec;108(12):776-779. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.4060/2015.
5
Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Is Superior to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Children Less Than 5 years of Age.对于5岁以下儿童,腹腔镜胃造口术优于经皮内镜下胃造口管置入术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jul;26(7):570-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0099. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Long-term outcomes of infants and children undergoing percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube placement.经皮内镜胃造口术置管婴儿和儿童的长期结局。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Nov;57(5):663-7. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a02624.
7
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of elective feeding tube placement in trauma patients.经皮内镜下胃造口术:创伤患者择期置管喂养的首选方法。
J Trauma. 2002 Jan;52(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200201000-00007.
8
Alternative techniques of feeding gastrostomy in children: a critical analysis.儿童胃造口术的替代喂养技术:批判性分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Mar;182(3):233-40.
9
A comparison of laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants: results from a single institution.腹腔镜胃造口术与经皮内镜胃造口术在婴儿中的比较:单中心研究结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2453-2456. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
10
Pediatric multicenter cohort comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and non-endoscopic gastrostomy technique outcomes.小儿经皮内镜与非内镜胃造口术技术结局的多中心队列比较。
J Investig Med. 2020 Feb;68(2):413-418. doi: 10.1136/jim-2019-001028. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends, demographic patterns, and regional disparities in gastrostomy: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Japan from 2014 to 2022.胃造口术的趋势、人口统计学模式及地区差异:一项基于日本2014年至2022年全国人口队列的研究
Surg Today. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03085-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective multicentre study.经皮内镜胃造口术的死亡率和并发症:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02429-0.
2
Prevalence and Trends in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement: Results From a 10-Year, Nationwide Analysis.经皮内镜下胃造口术置管的患病率及趋势:一项为期10年的全国性分析结果
Front Nutr. 2022 May 30;9:906409. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.906409. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality in Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.
经皮内镜胃造口术后 30 天患者死亡率的相关因素。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00040.
4
Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.经口肠内营养管饲用于重度痴呆患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 13;8(8):CD013503. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013503.pub2.
5
Percutaneous gastrostomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的经皮胃造瘘术:综述
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2022 May;23(3-4):176-189. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2021.1946089. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Factors predicting major complications, mortality, and recovery in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.经皮内镜下胃造口术主要并发症、死亡率及恢复情况的预测因素
JGH Open. 2021 Mar 31;5(5):590-598. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12538. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 1: Definitions and indications. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.成人患者肠内管内镜管理 - 第 1 部分:定义和适应证。欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2021 Jan;53(1):81-92. doi: 10.1055/a-1303-7449. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy?经皮内镜胃造口术——过于频繁?为时过晚?谁是胃造口术的合适患者?
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 28;26(20):2464-2471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2464.
9
Simple Bedside Predictors of Survival after Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Insertion.经皮胃造口管插入术后生存的简单床边预测指标。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov 16;2019:1532918. doi: 10.1155/2019/1532918. eCollection 2019.
10
Complications and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a high-volume centre.大容量中心经皮内镜下胃造口术的并发症及结局
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;54(4):513-518. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1594354. Epub 2019 Mar 24.