Poncelet Ethan J, Mull Henry F, Abate Yohannes, Robinson Gregory H, Douberly Gary E, Turney Justin M, Schaefer Henry F
Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024 Apr 24;26(16):12444-12452. doi: 10.1039/d3cp06098e.
Five structures of GeH and GeH are investigated in this study. Optimized geometries at the CCSD(T)/cc-pwCVQZ-PP level of theory were obtained. Focal point analyses were performed on these optimized geometries to determine relative energies using the CCSD(T) method with polarized basis sets up to quintuple-zeta. Energy corrections include full T and pertubative (Q) coupled-cluster effects plus anharmonic corrections to the zero-point vibrational energy. Relative ordering in energy from lowest to highest of the five GeH structures is butterfly, germylidene, monobridged, , then linear. In neutral GeH, the monobridged structure lies lower in energy than the germylidene structure. Fundamental vibrational frequencies and IR intensities were computed for the minima at the CCSD(T)/cc-pwCVTZ-PP level of theory to compare with experimental research. Partial atomic charges and natural bonding orbital analyses indicated that the positive charge of GeH is contained in the region of the Ge-Ge bond.