Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 May 1;258:111281. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111281. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
Patients receiving buprenorphine after a non-fatal overdose have lower risk of future nonfatal or fatal overdose, but less is known about the relationship between buprenorphine retention and the risk of adverse outcomes in the post-overdose year.
To examine the relationship between the total number of months with an active buprenorphine prescription (retention) and the odds of an adverse outcome within the 12 months following an index non-fatal overdose.
We studied a cohort of people with an index non-fatal opioid overdose in Maryland between July 2016 and December 2020 and at least one filled buprenorphine prescription in the 12-month post-overdose observation period. We used individually linked Maryland prescription drug and hospital admissions data. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine buprenorphine retention and associated odds of experiencing a second non-fatal overdose, all-cause emergency department visits, and all-cause hospitalizations.
Of 5439 people, 25% (n=1360) experienced a second non-fatal overdose, 78% had an (n=4225) emergency department visit, and 37% (n=2032) were hospitalized. With each additional month of buprenorphine, the odds of experiencing another non-fatal overdose decreased by 4.7%, all-cause emergency department visits by 5.3%, and all-cause hospitalization decreased by 3.9% (p<.0001, respectively). Buprenorphine retention for at least nine months was a critical threshold for reducing overdose risk versus shorter buprenorphine retention.
Buprenorphine retention following an index non-fatal overdose event significantly decreases the risk of future overdose, emergency department use, and hospitalization even among people already on buprenorphine.
接受丁丙诺啡治疗非致死性过量的患者未来非致死性或致死性过量的风险较低,但人们对丁丙诺啡保留与过量后一年内不良结局之间的关系知之甚少。
研究丁丙诺啡活跃处方(保留)总月数与指数性非致死性过量后 12 个月内不良结局发生几率之间的关系。
我们研究了马里兰州 2016 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间索引非致命性阿片类药物过量的人群,以及在过量后 12 个月观察期内至少有一次丁丙诺啡处方的人群。我们使用了个人链接的马里兰州处方药物和住院数据。多变量逻辑回归模型用于检查丁丙诺啡保留情况以及经历第二次非致死性过量、全因急诊就诊和全因住院的几率。
在 5439 人中,25%(n=1360)经历了第二次非致死性过量,78%(n=4225)有急诊就诊,37%(n=2032)住院。丁丙诺啡保留每增加一个月,再次发生非致死性过量的几率降低 4.7%,全因急诊就诊的几率降低 5.3%,全因住院的几率降低 3.9%(p<.0001,分别)。丁丙诺啡保留至少 9 个月是降低过量风险的关键阈值,而保留较短时间的丁丙诺啡则风险更高。
指数性非致死性过量事件后丁丙诺啡保留显著降低了未来过量、急诊就诊和住院的风险,即使在已经使用丁丙诺啡的人群中也是如此。